SHARE

FEATURED STORY April 25, 2023

Idaho Enacts New Coronavirus Vaccination Law

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

Under new legislation coined the "Coronavirus Stop Act," employers doing business in the state of Idaho may no longer require a coronavirus vaccination as a term of employment unless required by federal law or where the terms of employment include travel to foreign jurisdictions requiring vaccination.

Employers are also prohibited from offering different salary, hourly wage, or other ongoing compensation or benefits to an employee based on whether the employee has received a coronavirus vaccination.

Business entities that receive Medicare or Medicaid funding are exempt from these prohibitions.

The law, which went into effect on April 6, 2023, allows employers to offer one-time incentives to employees for receiving the COVID-19 vaccination. It also allows employers to provide time off from work to be vaccinated. The incentive must not result in an ongoing difference in salary, hourly wage, or compensation or benefits being provided to an employee based on whether the employee has been vaccinated.

The law also prohibits business entities in Idaho from refusing to provide any service, product, admission to a venue, or transportation to a person based on the individual's vaccination status.

Employers in Idaho with mandatory vaccination policies should consult with counsel to determine the appropriate next steps.

A growing number of states have enacted legislation directed at employer vaccine mandates. Utah's new Vaccine Passport Prohibition legislation will go into effect on May 3, 2023. Therefore, all employers should remain apprised of the different vaccine regulations and requirements, both statewide and federally.

Jackson Lewis attorneys are closely monitoring these developments. If you have questions about this new law, or other workplace law developments, please contact a Jackson Lewis attorney.


©2023 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Focused on labor and employment law since 1958, Jackson Lewis P.C.'s 950+ attorneys located in major cities nationwide consistently identify and respond to new ways workplace law intersects business. We help employers develop proactive strategies, strong policies and business-oriented solutions to cultivate high-functioning workforces that are engaged, stable and diverse, and share our clients' goals to emphasize inclusivity and respect for the contribution of every employee. For more information, visit https://www.jacksonlewis.com.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Jackson Lewis P.C.

Labor Department Releases New Guidance on Agency Enforcement of PUMP for Nursing Mothers Act

By Patricia Anderson Pryor Jackson Lewis P.C. May 19 , 2023

The U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division (WHD) has published guidance for agency officials responsible for enforcing the “pump at work” provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), including those enacted under the 2022 Providing Urgent Maternal Protections for Nursing Mothers Act (PUMP Act).

EEOC Classwide Subpoena Based on Individual Allegations Too Broad, Federal Appeals Court Rules

By Stephanie L. Adler-Paindiris Jackson Lewis P.C. May 17 , 2023

Denying the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) request to enforce a subpoena that would have expanded the agency’s investigation on a classwide basis, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has held the EEOC did not have the authority to expand the investigation beyond the individual allegations in the charge.

More From COVID-19

GT's The Performance Review Episode 20: All Secrets Revealed: Employee Investigations

By Philip I. Person Greenberg Traurig May 24 , 2023

In this episode, Sue Ann Van Dermyden, co-founder and senior partner at one of the nation’s top investigations firms, joins Philip Person and Ryan Bykerk to discuss the ins and outs of employee investigations.

NYC Passes Bill to Update Human Rights Law to Include Discrimination Based on Height, Weight

By Jerrold F. Goldberg Greenberg Traurig May 24 , 2023

On May 11, 2023, the New York City Council passed Intro 209-A, which would amend the New York City Human Rights Law to include prohibitions on discrimination based on height and weight.

Welcome Chris Salmen

By Christopher Salmen McDermott Will & Emery May 24 , 2023

Chris Salmen joined McDermott+Consulting earlier this month as a senior director, bringing his unique blend of medical device, diagnostic and digital health experience to advise clients on their go-to-market strategy.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...