SHARE

September 21, 2022

Biden Administration Clarifies That Government Will Not Enforce Federal Contractor COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

In a statement on its website, the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force has indicated that, until further notice, the government will not enforce any part (not just the COVID-19 vaccine mandate portion) of Executive Order 14042 (EO 14042).

Court Overturned Injunction

On August 26, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit published its decision overturning the nationwide injunction against the federal contractor COVID-19 vaccine mandate, but leaving the injunction in place for the plaintiff parties. It was initially unclear whether or how the federal government planned to enforce the vaccine mandate for contractors or jurisdictions that were not covered by this narrowed injunction or some other injunction.   

State of Existing Injunctions

Currently, the vaccine mandate portion of EO 14042 is enjoined by a patchwork of injunctions covering all or a portion of federal contracts in 25 states. These include the following:

  • Any contracts within the following states: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Kentucky, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wyoming;
  • Contracts between the following states themselves (and their agencies) and the federal government (i.e., not companies located or contracts performed within those states): Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Utah, and West Virginia; and
  • Others:
    • Any business that is domiciled or headquartered in Arizona; and
    • Nationwide - Any contract that received bids from:
      • Any member of the trade association Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC); or
      • The states of Georgia, Alabama, Idaho, Kansas, South Carolina, Utah, or West Virginia.

Updated Safer Federal Workforce Guidance

The Safer Federal Workforce Task Force has updated its website for federal contractors. The updated website states that the federal government "will take no action to implement or enforce [EO] 14042." It further stated that, for existing contracts containing a "clause implementing requirements of [EO] 14042, the Government will take no action to enforce the clause."

This guidance was not limited to just the vaccine mandate portion of EO 14042, which had been the subject the injunctions. Rather, the guidance stated that the federal government would not attempt to implement or enforce EO 14042. EO 14042 (and the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force guidance issued pursuant to EO 14042) included other COVID-19 workplace safety protocols, such as masking and physical distancing requirements at contractors' workplaces, and a requirement that contractors designate a person responsible for coordinating COVID-19 safety efforts at the contractors' workplaces. Accordingly, it appears that the federal government will no longer contractors' employees to wear masks at contractors' worksites (although employees may still be required to wear masks to enter certain federal facilities).

We will provide updates on any major developments related to EO 14042. If you have any questions about requirements for federal contractors, please contact any of the authors or the Jackson Lewis attorneys with whom you regularly work.


©2022 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Focused on labor and employment law since 1958, Jackson Lewis P.C.'s 950+ attorneys located in major cities nationwide consistently identify and respond to new ways workplace law intersects business. We help employers develop proactive strategies, strong policies and business-oriented solutions to cultivate high-functioning workforces that are engaged, stable and diverse, and share our clients' goals to emphasize inclusivity and respect for the contribution of every employee. For more information, visit https://www.jacksonlewis.com.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Jackson Lewis P.C.

New Jersey's Expanded Mini-WARN Law to Take Effect April 2023

By Timothy D. Speedy Jackson Lewis P.C. January 13 , 2023

After a two-year delay, the amendment to the New Jersey Millville-Dallas Airmotive Plant Job Loss Notification Act, the state’s mini-WARN law, will take effect on April 10, 2023.

A Deeper Dive Into FTC's Proposed Non-Compete Rule

By Clifford R. Atlas Jackson Lewis P.C. January 10 , 2023

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) proposed a new rule that, if made final, would (at least on its face) effectively prohibit non-compete agreements other than in very limited circumstances.

Guidance on ADA Accommodations and Medical Restrictions' 'Plain Meaning' From Federal Appeals Court

By Brian L. McDermott Jackson Lewis P.C. January 10 , 2023

The federal appeals court in Chicago has provided helpful guidance on employers’ obligation to accommodate qualified individuals’ medical restrictions under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in a case involving a correctional officer.

More From COVID-19

5 Trends to Watch in 2023 in Texas Health Care

By Joseph F. Coniglio Greenberg Traurig January 19 , 2023

Observers believe that the COVID-19-related public health emergency (PHE) will be extended until April of 2023.

Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies May Violate HIPAA

By Karin E. Ross Greenberg Traurig January 18 , 2023

In the midst of significant privacy changes in many U.S. states affecting tracking technologies such as cookies, pixels, and adtech, new lawsuits are alleging entities violated the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) via impermissible disclosure of protected health information due to the use of these technologies.

5 Trends to Watch: 2023 Financial Regulatory & Compliance

By Richard M. Cutshall Greenberg Traurig January 17 , 2023

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed 35 new rules and adopted 17 rules in 2022 alone.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...