August 15, 2022

FTC Takes Aim at "Commercial Surveillance"

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all OnPractice content.
Register Now

Key Takeaways

  • Important initiatives that may change privacy and data security practices in major ways.
  • The FTC also points to concerns about dark patterns, which coerce consumers into sharing personal data.

On August 11, the FTC released its Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, seeking public input on a host of questions relating to what it describes as "commercial surveillance"—or "the business of collecting, analyzing, and profiting from information about people"—in order to determine whether to issue a  new rule "to protect people's privacy and information in the commercial surveillance economy."    The FTC's questions are grouped into several categories, including harm to consumers, harm to children, automated systems, discrimination, consumer consent, and notice, transparency, and disclosure.  The dozens of specific questions range from broad to narrow, but they generally relate to the large amounts of data collected about consumers when they are connected to the internet.  As the FTC explains, its concerns range from data security to bias/discrimination to the inability of consumers to avoid this type of collection and processing.  The FTC also points to concerns about dark patterns, which coerce consumers into sharing personal data.

The FTC's announcement does not come as a surprise, as Chair Lina Khan has been hinting for months that action would be forthcoming.  However, the formal announcement drew quick blowback from some.  For example, Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), a member of the Senate Commerce Committee, stated that the proposal "is doomed to become another cautionary tale of how the left uses the regulatory state to tear down and rebuild the economy according to their own vision."  Similarly, FTC Commissioner Christine Wilson warned in her dissent that the FTC's efforts could derail the ongoing efforts to pass the bipartisan American Data Privacy Protection Act (ADPPA).

The deadline for submitting comments will be 60 days after the notice is published in the Federal Register in the coming days.  The public will also have an opportunity to share their input on these topics at a virtual public forum on September 8, 2022.  But as Commission Wilson's warning may indicate, the announcement alone could have impacts on the negotiations relating to the ADPPA even before the comment period ends.  In any event, companies should consider themselves on notice that the FTC plans to continue its focus on analytical tools, online collections, and use or sale of profiles derived from that information.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Ballard Spahr

New York Restricts Automated Decision Making in Employment

By Timothy Dickens Ballard Spahr August 29 , 2022

Businesses operating in New York City should be aware of a local law addressing the use of automated employment screening and decision-making tools coming into effect on January 1, 2023.

Status Update: Federal Contractor Vaccine Mandate Injunction Narrowed

By Lila A. Sevener Ballard Spahr August 29 , 2022

On August 26, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit narrowed the nationwide injunction of Executive Order 14042, which requires federal contractors and employees who work on or in connection with a covered federal contract, or share a workplace with another employee who works on or in connection with such contracts, to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19.

Unions Cannot Force OSHA to Issue Permanent COVID Standard

By Shannon D. Farmer Ballard Spahr August 26 , 2022

On August 26, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit turned back efforts by a group of unions seeking to force the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to quickly issue a permanent rule establishing protections for healthcare workers from COVID-19.

More From Consumer Protection

On the Road Again: Alternative Designs May Impact Trade Dress Functionality Analysis

By Kavya Rallabhandi McDermott Will & Emery May 25 , 2023

The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed and remanded a summary judgment ruling, finding that there were genuine disputes of material fact regarding whether the plaintiff’s alleged trade dress was functional and therefore excluded from trade dress protection.

Processing Sensitive Personal Information under U.S. State Privacy Laws

By Zachary S. Schapiro Greenberg Traurig May 23 , 2023

As of now, nine states (CA, CO, CT, IA, IN, MT, TN, UT, and VA) have passed comprehensive privacy laws that are in effect (CA and VA), or are about to go into effect sometime soon (CO, CT, IA, IN, MT, TN, and UT).

Labor Department Releases New Guidance on Agency Enforcement of PUMP for Nursing Mothers Act

By Patricia Anderson Pryor Jackson Lewis P.C. May 19 , 2023

The U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division (WHD) has published guidance for agency officials responsible for enforcing the “pump at work” provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), including those enacted under the 2022 Providing Urgent Maternal Protections for Nursing Mothers Act (PUMP Act).

Featured Stories