SHARE

August 01, 2022

Reshoring as a Trending Choice for Manufacturers

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

The COVID-19 pandemic affected 98% of global supply chains. Industries that invested significantly in offshoring to reduce costs saw dramatic risk increase, according to an article in The New York Times. Thus, U.S. executives are looking to "reshoring," or the repatriation of industrial production and manufacturing to U.S. soil, as an attractive opportunity.

While relocating manufacturing may not be the "lowest cost" option, it may be the "best cost" option when weighed against supply chain resiliency and sustainability. According to the Kearney 2021 Reshoring Index, the primary reasons U.S. companies consider reshoring include labor cost, labor availability, delivery times, logistics costs, and reduced carbon footprint. The common belief is that manufacturing jobs left the United States long ago for more cost-effective offshore labor. Recently, though, offshore manufacturing in countries like China has experienced wage inflation. Whereas, the Pew Research Center estimates the relative cost of U.S. labor has remained flat for over a decade. Reshoring could mitigate these costs and offer better service delivery, product quality, and brand perception.

The Kearney 2021 Reshoring Index found that 92% of the CEOs surveyed stated positive sentiments toward reshoring. Additionally, 79% of executives with manufacturing operations in China have already moved part of their operations to the United States or plan to do so in the next three years.

Reshoring efforts have occurred across many industrial sectors. Bloomberg highlights that construction of new U.S. manufacturing facilities has increased by 116% over the past year and aluminum and steel manufacturers are building new plants across the Southeast. Semiconductor chip factories in New York have opened, according to a Vox article, to help alleviate supply chain disruption in the automotive and electronic industries. To meet further demand in the electronics industry, semiconductor companies have announced new facilities in the Midwest that are projected to support tens of thousands of long-term jobs. Major U.S. retailers  reportedly have vowed to spend hundreds of billions of dollars over the next 10 years on domestically created goods. Finally, billion-dollar federal and state support aimed at encouraging domestic manufacturing underscores the impact that this trend will have on our economy.

Completely relocating manufacturing to the United States is not the only possibility — "near-shoring" or moving part of a company's supply chain to the nearby countries of Mexico, Canada, or some countries in Central America are possible prospects for future investments. The Kearney Reshoring Index found that nearly 70% of the surveyed CEOs stated that they are evaluating near-shoring, have near-shored, or will near-shore to these regions.

Companies planning to move home or near home should consider several possible challenges. Manufacturers may face a shortage of supplies and skilled workers in their new locales. If a company cannot readily secure raw materials in the new location, importation costs of these materials may reduce profit margins. Moreover, some have pointed out that access to skilled domestic technicians may hinder relocation efforts unless a plan is in place to train new workers. Companies creating a transition plan should also think about tax implications, employment matters, and real estate issues, and transportation availability.

Often, however, communities in the United States are eager to support relocating or expanding manufacturing by improvements infrastructure, jobs credit, and outright grants. For example, Missouri offers incentive programs to eligible companies for financing public or private infrastructure on capital improvement projects. Similarly, unions supporting U.S.-based companies may prove to be supportive of moves that bring more stability to the workforce.

Rather than wait for circumstances to return to "normal," companies instead can work to evolve their businesses to become even more agile and resilient in our "new normal." They should consider taking advantage of government or other programs that might support reshoring. Jackson Lewis attorneys can help manufacturers navigate the benefits and difficulties of reshoring and provide consultation services to make an effective plan.

(Legal Clerk Kennedy E. Dickson contributed to this article.) 


©2022 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Focused on labor and employment law since 1958, Jackson Lewis P.C.'s 950+ attorneys located in major cities nationwide consistently identify and respond to new ways workplace law intersects business. We help employers develop proactive strategies, strong policies and business-oriented solutions to cultivate high-functioning workforces that are engaged, stable and diverse, and share our clients' goals to emphasize inclusivity and respect for the contribution of every employee. For more information, visit https://www.jacksonlewis.com.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Jackson Lewis P.C.

New Jersey's Expanded Mini-WARN Law to Take Effect April 2023

By Timothy D. Speedy Jackson Lewis P.C. January 13 , 2023

After a two-year delay, the amendment to the New Jersey Millville-Dallas Airmotive Plant Job Loss Notification Act, the state’s mini-WARN law, will take effect on April 10, 2023.

A Deeper Dive Into FTC's Proposed Non-Compete Rule

By Clifford R. Atlas Jackson Lewis P.C. January 10 , 2023

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) proposed a new rule that, if made final, would (at least on its face) effectively prohibit non-compete agreements other than in very limited circumstances.

Guidance on ADA Accommodations and Medical Restrictions' 'Plain Meaning' From Federal Appeals Court

By Brian L. McDermott Jackson Lewis P.C. January 10 , 2023

The federal appeals court in Chicago has provided helpful guidance on employers’ obligation to accommodate qualified individuals’ medical restrictions under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in a case involving a correctional officer.

More From Manufacturing

Redundancy No Longer Out of Favor in Manufacturing

By James M. Stone Jackson Lewis P.C. January 09 , 2023

For decades, to increase efficiency and to reduce costs, manufacturers adopted the just-in-time approach, carefully tying manufacturing and staffing capabilities to meet demands without creating surplus.

Manufacturers of Custom Products Protecting Trade Secrets Involved in Production Process

By James M. Stone Jackson Lewis P.C. December 27 , 2022

Manufacturers wanting to protect their trade secrets, especially those related to the production of custom products made for specific customers, should consider some general practices that can increase the likelihood of keeping valuable information out of the hands of competitors.

President Biden Calls on Congress to Avoid Mass Railroad Strike

By Jonathan J. Spitz Jackson Lewis P.C. December 07 , 2022

President Joe Biden has asked Congress to step in and enact legislation in the hopes of preventing a nationwide railway strike.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...