SHARE

April 25, 2022

Agencies Provide Guidance on Impending Transparency in Coverage Rule Implementation

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Subscribe now to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content. Your subscription is free.
Subscribe Now

On April 19, 2022, the US Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and the Treasury (collectively, the Departments) released Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) regarding the implementation of certain reporting provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The FAQs were released to provide clarity on the required drug price disclosures identified in the Transparency in Coverage final rule (the Rule) issued on October 29, 2020.

The Rule requires most non-grandfathered group health plans and health insurance issuers to: (1) upon request, disclose pricing information specific to participants, beneficiaries or enrollees (or their authorized representative) (collectively referred to herein as participants); and (2) provide public disclosures in machine-readable files regarding in-network, out-of-network and prescription drug prices. Please see our On the Subject here for an in-depth overview of the Rule.

The Departments reiterated that the enforcement of the requirements related to machine-readable files disclosing in-network and out-of-network data will begin July 1, 2022 (enforcement of this part of the Rule related to prescription drugs has been delayed), and clear up confusion regarding reporting for certain alternative reimbursement arrangements. This On the Subject summarizes the safe harbor issued for disclosing rates on specific arrangements for which a dollar amount may not be available before the item or service is provided or rendered.

IN DEPTH


The Rules require plans and issuers to publish in the in-network machine-readable files all applicable rates (i.e., negotiated rates, underlying fee schedule rates or derived amounts), regardless of the type of payment model or models under which coverage is provided. The required rates must be reflected as dollar amounts. However, there are arrangements where a dollar amount can only be determined retrospectively because, for example, the agreement between the plan or issuer and the in-network provider states that the plan or issuer will pay a fixed percentage of the billed charges (i.e., such as "percentage-of-billed charges," low-volume procedures or high-cost, outlier inpatient care), thus the dollar amount cannot be determined until a claim is made.

In the FAQs, the Departments have provided an enforcement safe harbor for arrangements where a specific dollar amount cannot be determined to satisfy the reporting requirement. The safe harbor will not apply if the Departments determine that the arrangement at issue can sufficiently disclose a dollar amount.

  1. For a "Percentage-of-billed-charges" arrangement where dollar amounts cannot be assigned to an item or service for an in-network provider prior to a bill being generated, the plan or issuer may report a percentage number, in lieu of a dollar amount. The Departments provided specific language to use for percentage-of-billed-charges arrangements here.
  2. Under an alternative reimbursement arrangement, if the reporting tool or schema does not support the arrangement, or if the contractual arrangement requires the submission of additional information to describe the nature of the negotiated rate, plans and issuers may disclose it in an open text field a description of the formula, variables, methodology or other information necessary to understand the arrangement. The Departments provided additional guidance on specific language to use in the open text field here.

This safe harbor will take effect simultaneously with the enforcement of the disclosure requirements on July 1, 2022.

PRACTICAL APPLICATION

Plans and issuers must post machine-readable files to disclose in-network and out-of-network data by July 1, 2022. This is a delay of the previous enforcement deadline of January 1, 2022. For the vast majority of self-insured group health plans, compliance with the Rule will require coordination with third-party administrators or other plan vendors. Plan sponsors should be well along the way to preparing to meet the Rule's significant burden of complying with the disclosure obligation and, if not, should begin preparing as soon as possible. The added flexibility of the safe harbor should make this burden slightly easier to bear.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From McDermott Will & Emery

New York City's Wage Transparency Law to Take Effect November 1, 2022

By Christina S. Dumitrescu McDermott Will & Emery May 06 , 2022

On January 15, 2022, the New York City Council enacted Local Law 32 of 2022 (Wage Transparency Law or Law) to amend the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) to require that most employers include compensation data in their job advertisements. The Law was supposed to take effect on May 15, 2022, however, it faced criticism over a number of ambiguities, including undefined penalties. In response, on April 28, 2022, the New York City Council passed an amendment to the Wage Transparency Law. Among the biggest changes is that employers now have until November 1, 2022—more than six months—to ensure compliance with the Law’s requirements. If Mayor Eric Adams signs the Law, which he is expected to do, New York City will become the second jurisdiction in the country (the first being Colorado) to require employers to include minimum and maximum potential salary amounts for open positions in job postings.

NAIC Continues to Refine Multiyear Work Plan to Expand Scrutiny of Holding Company Act Filings

By Andrea T. Best McDermott Will & Emery May 05 , 2022

In our report published on April 26, 2022, we discussed the New York Department of Financial Services’ (NYDFS) Circular Letter No. 5 in which it reminded the industry that acquiring less than 10% of an insurer’s voting securities does not necessarily mean that the acquirer (1) is not a “controller” and (2) does not have to submit a Form A application to the insurer’s home state or domestic regulator seeking approval for the change of control. This topic is one of several related matters that various committees, task forces and working groups of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) are studying and will continue to study over a multiyear period (the Project).

European Union, United Kingdom Propose New Sanctions Against Russia, Including Ban on Certain Services

By Raminta Dereskeviciute McDermott Will & Emery May 04 , 2022

As Russia continues to escalate its military operations in Ukraine, the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom (UK) unveiled details of new sanctions against Russia. This alert summarises the proposed restrictions.

More From Health Care

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Prejudice Requirement for Waiver of Arbitration

By Mark J. Levin Ballard Spahr May 23 , 2022

The U.S. Supreme Court today held that waiver of the right to arbitrate does not require a showing that the other party was prejudiced. The unanimous opinion by Justice Kagan in Morgan v. Sundance reversed the Eighth Circuit, which had held that a party waives the right to arbitrate if it knew of the right, acted inconsistently with that right and prejudiced the other party by its inconsistent actions.

Fifth Circuit Decision Could Undermine Constitutionality of HHS Civil Money Penalty Laws

By Robert P. Charrow Greenberg Traurig May 20 , 2022

On May 18, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued its decision in Jarkesy v. Securities and Exchange Comm’n, in which it examined the constitutionality of an agency civil money penalty enforcement proceeding.

Delaware to Mandate Paid Family Leave Starting in 2026: 5 Steps to Help Employers Prepare for the Transition

By Michael E. Truncellito Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney May 17 , 2022

Delaware has become the 11th state to guarantee paid parental, medical, and military leave for private-sector workers.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...