November 30, 2021

New York City Enacts Law Requiring Severance Pay for Hotel Employees

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all OnPractice content.
Register Now

On October 5, 2021, Mayor Bill de Blasio signed into law a requirement that New York City hotels pay their non-managerial employees $500 in severance pay every week, for each week after October 11, 2021 that the employees remain laid off. This is in addition to any severance paid to employees for periods prior to October 11, 2021. The law is effective immediately and expires on June 1, 2022.

Under the new law, severance is capped at 30 weeks and the requirement to pay severance to an employee ceases when either (1) the employee is recalled, or (2) a closed hotel has recalled 25 percent or more of its employees by October 11, 2021 and reopens to the public by November 1, 2021. For those hotels that did not close completely, the only remedy to avoid severance appears to be a recall of all employees.

Not all hotels and hotel employees are covered. The law only applies to hotels that had 100 or more rooms as of March 1, 2020, and which closed or engaged in a mass layoff of over 75% of their employees on or after March 1, 2020. Only non-managerial hotel employees who were employed by the hotel on March 1, 2020, and who had been employed by the hotel for at least a year by that date, are eligible for the new severance pay.

The remedy for violation of the law, which provides a private right of action, is steep: employees who do not receive their severance can recover twice the amount owed, along with reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.

The law—which was lauded by its proponents for incentivizing the reopening of hotels closed by the pandemic—has already generated a legal challenge. On October 8, 2021, the Hotel Association of New York City initiated a lawsuit against New York City in the Southern District of New York, arguing that the new law essentially requires a new employee benefit plan, thus unlawfully preempting the federal U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act. The Court has not yet had an opportunity to address the merits of this argument.

Hotel employers should consider the potential cost of severance payments under the new law, and, to the extent feasible, weigh their plans to reopen and recall employees.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Employment Law

GT's The Performance Review Episode 20: All Secrets Revealed: Employee Investigations

By Philip I. Person Greenberg Traurig May 24 , 2023

In this episode, Sue Ann Van Dermyden, co-founder and senior partner at one of the nation’s top investigations firms, joins Philip Person and Ryan Bykerk to discuss the ins and outs of employee investigations.

NYC Passes Bill to Update Human Rights Law to Include Discrimination Based on Height, Weight

By Jerrold F. Goldberg Greenberg Traurig May 24 , 2023

On May 11, 2023, the New York City Council passed Intro 209-A, which would amend the New York City Human Rights Law to include prohibitions on discrimination based on height and weight.

Labor Department Releases New Guidance on Agency Enforcement of PUMP for Nursing Mothers Act

By Patricia Anderson Pryor Jackson Lewis P.C. May 19 , 2023

The U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division (WHD) has published guidance for agency officials responsible for enforcing the “pump at work” provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), including those enacted under the 2022 Providing Urgent Maternal Protections for Nursing Mothers Act (PUMP Act).

Featured Stories