October 14, 2021

Hospitals Lose Outlier Payment and S-10 Audit Litigations

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all OnPractice content.
Register Now

For more information about this blog post, please contact Khaled J. KleleRyan M. MageeLabinot Alexander BerlajolliBrianna J. Santolli, or Connor Breza.

Appellate Division Dismisses Outlier Payment Case

Lee Memorial Hospital v. Becerra, No. 20-5085 (DC Cir. 2021)

In this case, eight years ago, a number of acute-care hospitals sued the Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS"), challenging the amount of so-called Medicare "outlier" payments they had received from the HHS for the years 2008-2011. Generally speaking, outlier payments are intended to protect health care facilities from unexpected losses by providing Medicare reimbursements in instances of rare and costly treatments.

At the commencement of the litigation, the hospitals first argued to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ("District Court") that the District Court had jurisdiction to consider their suit and urged the court to render a decision on the merits of the case. Accepting the hospitals' jurisdictional argument, the District Court subsequently ruled against the hospitals on the merits. In an abrupt change of course, several of the hospitals then appealed that ruling, arguing for the first time that the District Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain their lawsuit after all.

On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit declined to accept the hospitals' about-face. Instead, the Appellate Division ruled that for the hospitals to prevail in showing that the now-final judgment against them was void because the District Court ostensibly lacked jurisdiction to enter it, they would need to show that there was not even an arguable basis for that District Court's conclusion—at the urging of the hospitals themselves—that jurisdiction existed over their challenge. The hospitals failed to make that showing.

The full appellate opinion can be found here.

Appellate Division Rejects S-10 Audit Litigation

Ascension Borgess Hosp. v. Becerra, No. 20-139 (DC Cir. 2021)

In this case, 48 hospitals eligible to receive uncompensated care payments under 42 U.S.C. § 1395ww(r) sued HHS, claiming Worksheet S-10 audits conducted in 2015 unlawfully reduced or otherwise altered the amounts of payment made by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The hospitals first appealed those reimbursement decisions to the Provider Reimbursement Review Board ("PRRB"), arguing that HHS's use of unpublished audit protocols to establish uncompensated care payments violated the notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act. The PRRB determined that administrative review of the uncompensated care payments was barred by 42 U.S.C. § 1395ww(r)'s preclusion provision and, consequently, concluded that it did not have jurisdiction over the issues in the appeals. The hospitals then appealed the PRRB's final decisions to the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, challenging the PRRB's dismissal of their reimbursement appeals for lack of jurisdiction. 

The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Ultimately, the D.C. Circuit granted HHS's motion for summary judgment, while denying the plaintiffs', holding that the applicable preclusion provision of 42 U.S.C. § 1395ww(r)(3) bars administrative and judicial review of HHS's decision to use audited worksheet data in calculating the amount of uncompensated care payments to which the hospitals were entitled.

The full appellate opinion can be found here.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP

SEC May Require Advisers and Funds to Draft Cybersecurity Policies and Disclose Incidents

By Michael P. O'Mullan Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP February 11 , 2022

Following the rise of cybercrime and on the coattails of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) promulgating final rules concerning cybersecurity requirements for the financial services sector, we knew that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was not far behind.

New York Insurance Disclosure Act May Cause Significant Changes In New York State Court Lawsuits

By Brian E. O’Donnell Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP February 10 , 2022

On December 31, 2021, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed into law the Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act (the “Act”)

FINRA to Prioritize Cryptocurrency, Options Account Paperwork, and Expungement Reform in 2022

By Michael P. O'Mullan Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP January 24 , 2022

During a January 19, 2021, webinar with the SIFMA Compliance & Legal Society, FINRA president and CEO Robert Cook discussed with participants FINRA’s priorities for 2022.

More From Health Care Law

City of Atlanta Adopts New Protections for Criminal History Status, Gender Expression

By Emily S. Borna Jackson Lewis P.C. December 07 , 2022

The Atlanta City Council has amended the City of Atlanta Anti-Discrimination Ordinance to extend protections to citizens on the basis of criminal history status and gender expression in employment, housing, and public accommodations.

Trade Secret Law Evolution Podcast Episode 51: The Sixth Circuit Analyzes Key Concepts in Trade Secret Law in Affirming Major Jury Verdict

By Jordan D. Grotzinger Greenberg Traurig December 02 , 2022

You are invited to listen to Episode 51 of Greenberg Traurig’s Trade Secret Law Evolution Podcast, "The Sixth Circuit Analyzes Key Concepts in Trade Secret Law in Affirming Major Jury Verdict."

A Tsunami of Lawsuits Is Expected to Slam Institutions in the Wake of New York Adult Survivors Act

By Greer Griffith McDermott Will & Emery December 01 , 2022

A new revival window opened on Thanksgiving Day for filing sexual assault and abuse lawsuits that would otherwise be time-barred by the New York statute of limitations.

Featured Stories