SHARE

March 13, 2023

CBAM on Track to Take Effect in October 2023

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now
Go-To Guide:
  • Parliament and Council reached a provisional political agreement on CBAM in December 2022
  • In February 2023, ENVI endorsed the provisional political agreement
  • CBAM is expected to be implemented gradually, yet relatively swiftly

The European Parliament (Parliament) enacted significant change to the proposed European Union (EU) Regulation for a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) in June 2022, as reported in an earlier GT Alert.

In turn, the Council and the Parliament reached a provisional political agreement on CBAM in December 2022. Following the provisional political agreement, the Council and Parliament must still formally approve CBAM before the regulation can be published in the EU Official Journal.

CBAM would require companies importing cement, electricity, fertilizers, iron, steel, aluminum, and other materials into the EU to pay a carbon adjustment at the border corresponding to the carbon price that would have been paid had the goods been produced under the EU's carbon pricing rules.

This GT Alert outlines two noteworthy developments that have arisen since December 2022.

ENVI endorses the CBAM provisional political agreement

On Feb. 9, 2023, the Parliament's Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) endorsed the provisional political agreement reached with the Council. With 88 members, ENVI is the largest committee in the Parliament, and the one holding the pen on CBAM. 63 ENVI members voted in favor; seven voted against; seven abstained; and 11 members did not take part in the vote.

ENVI's endorsement is leading CBAM closer to formal adoption. CBAM will be on the agenda for the Parliament's April 2023 plenary session, when the final vote will take place. The Council must also formally approve CBAM before it can take effect, although typically this is more of a formality once Parliament approves.

CoR proposes minor amendments to CBAM

On March 2, 2023, the EU Committee of the Regions (CoR) published an opinion, inter alia, addressing and proposing several minor amendments to CBAM. CoR's opinion has been referred to ENVI for consideration. Unlike the Parliament, CoR is not an official EU institution, but rather an EU body intended to represent local and regional authorities within the EU. The Council and the European Commission are obliged to consult CoR in certain cases before taking a decision. Additionally, CoR has the right to issue opinions on its own initiative, but these opinions do not bind EU institutions. Nevertheless, the fact that CoR only proposed minor amendments increases the likelihood of CBAM becoming formally approved by the Council and the Parliament in the near future.

Next steps

Based on these recent developments, CBAM is expected to take effect in October 2023 and be fully operational in January 2026.

If CBAM receives the necessary approvals, EU importers will be required to report carbon emissions associated with the covered goods starting Oct. 1, 2023. Thereafter, these importers will need to purchase CBAM certificates beginning Jan. 1, 2026. If an EU importer can demonstrate that it has already paid for the carbon used during production of the imported goods in another country, the number of required CBAM certificates would reduce accordingly. The price of the CBAM certificates will be calculated based on the weekly average auction price of emissions allowances under the existing EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). The current free allowances allocated to prevent carbon leakage will be phased out over a nine-year period between 2026 and 2034.

If CBAM takes effect, importers of the covered goods will need to register, either individually or through a representative, with the relevant authority, from whom they eventually can also purchase CBAM certificates. Imports of goods from all non-EU countries will be affected by the carbon adjustment, and the adjustment is expected to affect the entire supply chain.

* Special thanks to Meiyanne Sturm˘ for her valuable contributions to this GT Alert.
˘ Not admitted to the practice of law.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Greenberg Traurig

The New York Court of Appeals: A Triumph of Merit Selection

By Henry M. Greenberg Greenberg Traurig May 25 , 2023

The current court is a triumph of the merit selection process that New Yorkers voted for in 1977.

Attorney Fees Awards Under the Clean Streams Law

By David Mandelbaum Greenberg Traurig May 24 , 2023

In February, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided that the Environmental Hearing Board could award attorney fees and litigation costs to a prevailing third-party appellant under the Clean Streams Law.

GT's The Performance Review Episode 20: All Secrets Revealed: Employee Investigations

By Philip I. Person Greenberg Traurig May 24 , 2023

In this episode, Sue Ann Van Dermyden, co-founder and senior partner at one of the nation’s top investigations firms, joins Philip Person and Ryan Bykerk to discuss the ins and outs of employee investigations.

More From Tax

Attorney Fees Awards Under the Clean Streams Law

By David Mandelbaum Greenberg Traurig May 24 , 2023

In February, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided that the Environmental Hearing Board could award attorney fees and litigation costs to a prevailing third-party appellant under the Clean Streams Law.

GeTtin' SALTy Episode 5 | FTA Demystified

By Nikki E. Dobay Greenberg Traurig May 16 , 2023

In this episode of GeTtin’ SALTy, host Nikki Dobay is joined by Sharonne Bonardi, Executive Director of the Federation of Tax Administrators (FTA).

Buehler Doesn't Get a Day Off from Double Taxation

By Charles Moll, III McDermott Will & Emery May 12 , 2023

The California Office of Tax Appeals (OTA) recently held that a California resident’s income tax paid to Massachusetts from the sale of his membership interest in a limited liability company (LLC) doing business in Massachusetts was not eligible for California’s other state tax credit.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...