SHARE

FEATURED STORY December 29, 2022

Construction Companies Become Latest Targets of EEOC

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) promised in a March 2022 hearing to address what it considered to be "severe and pervasive" discrimination in the construction sector. According to EEOC Chair Charlotte Burrows, "[M]any women and people of color have either been shut out of construction jobs or face discrimination that limits their ability to thrive in these careers."

The EEOC is keeping its promise. Since the March hearing, the EEOC has filed numerous lawsuits against construction companies throughout the country, including Arizona, California, Florida, New York, Washington, and Wisconsin. Tackling harassment issues in the construction industry appears to be the primary theme.

Examples of EEOC Actions

For example, the EEOC filed suit in California against a construction claiming that supervisors subjected Latino workers to national origin harassment. The agency alleged that the supervisors referred to the workers as "wetbacks" and "Home Depoteros" and mocked them if they could not speak English. The alleged harassment also included anti-Latino graffiti found in portable restrooms at the worksite that included abusive terms and offensive imagery demeaning to Latino workers.

In July 2022, the EEOC settled a lawsuit it filed against a Washington construction contractor in which the agency alleged that seven current and former female employees had endured sexual harassment during their employment. The company's owner purportedly made comments that female employees did not belong in the industry. The female employees also claimed the company failed to investigate harassment complaints.

In September 2022, the EEOC filed two different race discrimination suits against companies in Florida. In one of the suits, the EEOC alleged that the company's management regularly used the N-word in front of Black employees and that another manager humiliated a Black employee by ramming a shovel from the back between his legs. After objecting to the assault, the company terminated the Black employee the same day. In the second suit, the EEOC alleged that management routinely used derogatory slurs by referring to Black employees as "boy," "biscuit lips," and "African bastards," as well as frequent use of the N-word. Management also allegedly referred to Latinos as "stupid Mexicans," "wetbacks," and "these f—ing Puerto Ricans," among other slurs. When the employees complained, the company allegedly terminated them in retaliation.

How to Avoid Claims

Construction companies need to be proactive if they want to avoid claims from the EEOC or the private bar.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits employers from discriminating against applicants and employees because of race, color, gender, national origin, and religion in the terms and conditions of employment. Other laws also protect individuals from discrimination due to age, military status, disability, citizenship, and genetics. The terms and conditions of employment include one's working environment; therefore, harassment based on any one of these protected classes can be a violation of federal law — and sometimes state law.

Companies should start by taking a hard look at their equal employment opportunity policies, including their harassment policies. After ensuring these policies are up to date, companies need to ensure that supervisors are properly trained on (1) what conduct they are prohibited from doing and (2) how to respond if they become aware of a potential violation of the policy.

Companies should not forget about training hourly workers. The training should ensure that employees know what the company policy is and that they know how to file a complaint. Companies should also assure workers that they will not suffer retaliation for reporting a violation of company policies, participating in an investigation, or opposing discrimination or harassment. This training is particularly important in the construction industry as construction companies typically do not have a human resource office on a construction site.

Please contact a Jackson Lewis attorney with any questions.


©2022 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Focused on labor and employment law since 1958, Jackson Lewis P.C.'s 950+ attorneys located in major cities nationwide consistently identify and respond to new ways workplace law intersects business. We help employers develop proactive strategies, strong policies and business-oriented solutions to cultivate high-functioning workforces that are engaged, stable and diverse, and share our clients' goals to emphasize inclusivity and respect for the contribution of every employee. For more information, visit https://www.jacksonlewis.com.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Jackson Lewis P.C.

New Jersey's Expanded Mini-WARN Law to Take Effect April 2023

By Timothy D. Speedy Jackson Lewis P.C. January 13 , 2023

After a two-year delay, the amendment to the New Jersey Millville-Dallas Airmotive Plant Job Loss Notification Act, the state’s mini-WARN law, will take effect on April 10, 2023.

A Deeper Dive Into FTC's Proposed Non-Compete Rule

By Clifford R. Atlas Jackson Lewis P.C. January 10 , 2023

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) proposed a new rule that, if made final, would (at least on its face) effectively prohibit non-compete agreements other than in very limited circumstances.

Guidance on ADA Accommodations and Medical Restrictions' 'Plain Meaning' From Federal Appeals Court

By Brian L. McDermott Jackson Lewis P.C. January 10 , 2023

The federal appeals court in Chicago has provided helpful guidance on employers’ obligation to accommodate qualified individuals’ medical restrictions under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in a case involving a correctional officer.

More From Construction

One Man's Trash Is Another Man's ... House?!

By Christine S. Varghese Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti January 26 , 2023

Would you live in a house made of recycled plastic water bottles?

Judge Tosses First Amendment Defense In Yuga Labs V. Ryder Ripps

By Mioko C. Tajika Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti January 24 , 2023

On December 16, 2022, a federal district judge in California denied artist Ryder Ripps’s and his partner’s anti-SLAPP motion and motion to dismiss in a closely monitored action filed against them by Yuga Labs, Inc. (“Yuga”), the creator behind the monumentally successful Bored Ape Yacht Club (“BAYC”) NFTs.

5 Trends to Watch in 2023 International Arbitration

By Joseph J. Mamounas Greenberg Traurig January 19 , 2023

To meet demand for more flexible and timely ways to achieve dispute resolution, some clients are turning to emergency arbitration procedures as ways to not only preserve the status quo but also obtain an early assessment of the merits (through the lens of the likelihood of success).

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...