SHARE

November 30, 2022

IRS Issues Critical Wage and Apprenticeship Guidance under Inflation Reduction Act of 2022

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

The US Department of the Treasury just released its guidance on the labor requirements that must be fulfilled in order to maintain the credit for the full amount for clean energy and infrastructure projects under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (Act). This includes renewable energy, energy storage, hydrogen, biogas, carbon capture and electric vehicle charging infrastructure. The guidance covers the Act's two fundamental critical labor requirements— providing prevailing wages and employing a certain amount of registered apprentices—that project developers must meet for clean energy projects to maintain the credit for the full amount of 30% for the investment tax credit (ITC) or the full amount of the production tax credit (PTC).

As detailed further below, depending upon a project's development status, such guidance either triggers a mad dash to begin construction by January 28, 2023, in order to be exempted from such requirements or continues to leave developers a bit in the dark on operational and administrative requirements for projects beginning construction after January 28, 2023 (as actual wages are not yet published), each assuming formal guidance is published in the Federal Register on November 30.

IN DEPTH


Key Takeaways

  • The guidance is scheduled to be published Wednesday, November 30, 2022.
  • The guidance starts the clock on a 60-day period for the labor provisions to take effect and impacts renewable energy, storage, hydrogen, biogas and carbon capture projects and electric vehicle charging infrastructure.
  • The net result is twofold and depends upon where a project is on its development timeline.
  • For those projects further along in the development lifecycle and that seek both (i) an exemption from the requirements as well as (ii) qualification for such tax benefits, such projects must be under construction by January 28, 2023, to be exempted from the new requirements (assuming formal guidance is published in the Federal Register on November 30).
  • For such projects, the guidance triggers a sprint to start construction of such projects before the new wage and apprentice requirements take effect.
  • The guidance clarifies that the two existing, long-standing methods to determine the start date of construction on a project still apply: (i) physical work and (ii) 5% safe harbor tests.
  • For those projects not seeking to "beat the clock" and that will start construction after January 28, 2023, there is currently little information about how to actually confirm you are paying appropriate wages.
  • The required wages vary by job type and location.
  • The guidance instructs project developers to access the wages published on the US Department of Labor website at sam.gov.
  • However, there are currently no postings for many job types or locations.
  • The guidance also includes instructions on how to request a wage determination from the department if the information is not available online.
  • Developers should send emails requesting wage determinations to [email protected] with the "facility, facility location, proposed labor classifications, proposed prevailing wage rates, job descriptions and duties, and any rationale for the proposed classifications."
  • The guidance reiterates certain information on qualified apprentices under the Act.
  • It states qualified apprentices must be used for 10% to 15% of total labor hours.
  • The percentage is 10% for projects on which construction starts in 2022 or earlier, 12.5% for projects starting construction in 2023 and 15% thereafter.
  • At least one qualified apprentice must be used on any project that at least four individuals will participate.
  • The guidance further directs owners to employ general record-keeping requirements, such as accounting for contractors and subcontractors, to prove to the federal government that they are hiring qualified apprentices or made a good faith effort to find them and that required wages were paid.
  • Such records must identify the wage determinations, the mechanics and laborers who performed the work, the classifications of work they performed, their hours worked in each classification and the wage rates paid for the work.

Conclusion

The newly released guidance is important to those developers and investors who may benefit from "beating the clock" in order to gain an exemption from the new requirements. And while the guidance is informative on certain other aspects of project development post the 60-day clock, there are still some gaps that remain for developers to fill in before they can be certain these projects will meet the guidance on wages and pencil out.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From McDermott Will & Emery

Trending in Telehealth: January 9 - 16, 2023

By Amanda Enyeart McDermott Will & Emery January 19 , 2023

Trending in Telehealth is a new weekly series from the McDermott Digital Health team where we track telehealth regulatory and legislative activity.

That Stings: Consent to Jurisdiction Must Be Effective at Filing to Invoke Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(k)(2)

By Joshua Revilla McDermott Will & Emery January 19 , 2023

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, on petition for writ of mandamus, vacated the district court’s transfer order and remanded the transfer to be considered under the clarified parameters of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(k)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 1404.

Absent Expressed Rationale of Obviousness, Federal Circuit Calls for Do-Over

By Anisa Noorassa McDermott Will & Emery January 19 , 2023

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a ruling by the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (Board) where, on appeal, the US Patent & Trademark Office’s (PTO) rationale for sustaining the Board’s obviousness rejection did not reflect “the reasoning or findings the Board actually invoked.”

More From Energy

CFPB Says 'Show Me The (Consumer Unfriendly) Fine Print'

By Timothy A. Butler Greenberg Traurig January 25 , 2023

On Jan. 11, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released a proposed rule that would require certain nonbank financial companies subject to its supervisory jurisdiction to submit annual reports about their use of terms and conditions that attempt to waive or limit consumer rights and protections.

Trending in Telehealth: January 9 - 16, 2023

By Amanda Enyeart McDermott Will & Emery January 19 , 2023

Trending in Telehealth is a new weekly series from the McDermott Digital Health team where we track telehealth regulatory and legislative activity.

10 Issues to Watch in the New Congress

By Robert Mangas Greenberg Traurig January 17 , 2023

The split party control in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives will require bipartisanship to produce successful legislation over the next two years.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...