Supreme Court to Consider Whether Lanham Act Reaches Foreign Defendants' Extraterritorial Conduct
Free Article Limit This Month
The Supreme Court of the United States agreed to review the geographic scope of the Lanham Act and the extent to which trademark owners can use US trademarks to police foreign sales. Abitron Austria GmbH et al. v. Hetronic International Inc., Case No. 21-1043 (Supr. Ct. Nov. 4, 2022) (certiorari granted). The question presented is as follows:
Whether the court of appeals erred in applying the Lanham Act extraterritorially to petitioners' foreign sales, including purely foreign sales that never reached the United States or confused U.S. consumers.
In the underlying case, the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit upheld a damages award for Hetronic International based on its conclusion that the Lanham Act can affect conduct that substantially affects US commerce, such as the products Hetronic Germany and others sold to European customers.
The US Solicitor General suggested that the case is "a suitable vehicle" to clarify the Lanham Act's geographic scope, noting that the Lanham Act provides a remedy for a foreign defendant's use of a US trademark abroad only if that use is likely to cause confusion within the United States.
ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.