SHARE

October 18, 2022

New California Legislation Will Not Allow Employers to Prohibit Off-the-Job Marijuana Use for Much Longer

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

This blog post is a Q&A on California Assembly Bill-2188 - Discrimination in employment: use of cannabis.


When will AB 2188 go into effect?

AB 2188 was signed by Governor Newsom on Sept. 18, 2022, but will not become operative until Jan. 1, 2024.

Isn't cannabis use already legal in California?

Yes, the use of cannabis - also known as marijuana - for medicinal purposes has been allowed in California since voters passed Proposition 215 in 1996. California went a step further after the 2016 passage of Proposition 64, which legalized recreational marijuana use. Prop. 64, however, did not restrict employers from enacting and enforcing workplace policies pertaining to cannabis.

What will AB 2188 do?

AB 2188 prohibits employers from discriminating against employees based on: (1) the employee's use of cannabis off the job and away from the workplace; and (2) a drug screening test that has found the person to have nonpsychoactive cannabis metabolites in their hair, blood, urine, or other bodily fluids.

Are there exceptions to AB 2188's new rules?

Yes, AB 2188 does not apply to employees in the "building and construction trades." Nor does it apply to employees in positions requiring federal government background investigations or security clearances through the United States Department of Defense.

Can I discipline an employee who shows up to work high?

Yes, the new law does not permit an employee to be "impaired by" cannabis on the job. The statute does not define impairment, which could lead to future litigation.

Can I still drug test my employees?

Yes, the statute continues to allow employers to use-test their employees so long as the tests are not based on whether the employee has "nonpsychoactive cannabis metabolites" in their body. This could include tests that measure the presence of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the principal psychoactive constituent of cannabis. Further, AB 2188 does not impact any state or federal laws that require certain employees to be tested for controlled substances.

Can I still prohibit my employees from possessing marijuana in the workplace?

Yes, AB 2188 does not provide employees with the right to possess marijuana on the job.

Do any other states have similar protections?

Yes, Connecticut, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, and Rhode Island have all passed laws protecting employees who recreationally smoke marijuana outside the workplace.

Isn't marijuana use illegal under federal law?

The federal prohibition on marijuana has existed since 1937, and federal law continues to classify cannabis as an illegal substance. Federal authorities are still authorized to prosecute Californians who use cannabis, but it is still unclear if and how that authority will be used. President Biden recently issued a presidential proclamation that pardons federal convictions for simple marijuana possession offenses. Also, the Office of Personnel Management previously issued a memorandum prohibiting federal agencies from automatically finding individuals unsuitable for federal employment based on prior marijuana use. This may indicate that federal prosecution is not likely for marijuana users who act in compliance with state and local marijuana laws and consistent with federal concerns such as preventing minors from using marijuana.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Greenberg Traurig

California AG Announces Investigation of Mobile Apps' CCPA Compliance

By Gretchen A. Ramos Greenberg Traurig January 31 , 2023

On Jan. 27, 2023, the California Attorney General announced his office is investigating and sending letters to businesses in the retail, travel, and food industries with popular mobile apps that allegedly are not in compliance with the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) by failing to offer a consumer opt-out mechanism for sales, or honor rights requests submitted via authorized agents.

E2 Law Podcast: Episode 20 | Empire Environmental - Review of New York's Cap-and-Invest Program to Reduce Emissions and Achieve Climate Goals

By Steven C. Russo Greenberg Traurig January 27 , 2023

In this episode of Greenberg Traurig's E2 Podcast, attorneys Steven Russo, Zackary Knaub, and Jane McLaughlin discuss New York State’s cap-and-invest program to limit greenhouse gas emissions and share revenue with New Yorkers from disadvantaged communities to help cover utility bills, transportation costs, and decarbonization.

5 Trends to Watch: 2023 Data Privacy & Cybersecurity

By Gretchen A. Ramos Greenberg Traurig January 26 , 2023

While ransomware attacks have been on the rise since 2020, a recent trend has emerged where threat actors are bypassing ransomware malware and encryption tactics and going straight to data theft.

More From Marijuana

Legalized & Leasing - The Dilemma Facing NYC Landlords And Unlicensed Marijuana Dispensaries

By Michael A. Mulia Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti January 27 , 2023

The cannabis cash grab is fully underway in New York City and many commercial landlords (whether willingly or unwillingly) find themselves as key participants in the industry.

USCIS Agrees to Bundle H-4, L-2, and EAD Applications Filed with Principal's Petition

By Kristen T. Burke Greenberg Traurig January 26 , 2023

As a result of a class action lawsuit, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has entered into a settlement agreement to “bundle” an application to extend or change H-4 or L-2 status and, if applicable, an employment authorization document (EAD) application, if the application is filed with the principal’s corresponding H-1B or L-1 petition.

FinCEN Proposes Rule on Access to Beneficial Ownership Information

By Marina Olman-Pal Greenberg Traurig January 24 , 2023

On Dec. 15, 2022, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM or Proposed Rule) implementing the provisions of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) that govern access to beneficial ownership information (BOI) FinCEN collects and maintains.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...