August 23, 2022

How Can Implicit Bias Training in the Real Estate Industry Achieve Enhanced Effectiveness?

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all OnPractice content.
Register Now

In recent years, the nation has made efforts to raise awareness of implicit bias in employment and across industry groups. The real estate industry has seen states, such as California and New York, requiring real estate professionals to complete implicit or unconscious bias training courses as part of their pre-licensing or continuing education requirements.

Much of this training has routinely been offered by third party educational institutions. One association of real estate professionals, for example, created an online implicit bias training video in 2020 and introduced a new implicit bias certificate course in May 2022. Industry leaders are establishing training courses that explore how the real estate industry is affected by implicit bias biases. An appraisal trade group has stated they will begin requiring appraisers to take a seven-hour course based on fair housing laws and bias. The first half of the course will discuss how the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice addresses issues related to fair housing violations and focuses on how to avoid bias and the perception of bias. The second half of the course includes test exercises. Through other providers such as McKissock Learning, real estate professionals can access implicit bias training courses that can be taken as an elective or as part of a state-mandated requirement.

study by Harvard Business Review showed training courses are most effective when they teach attendees to manage biases, change behavior, and track progress. Real estate companies and employers can aim to maximize the effectiveness of implicit bias training by establishing supplemental training requirements that will raise awareness and promote accountability in addressing individual implicit biases.

Real estate professionals and employers should consider implementing the following learning topics and strategies:

  • Types of Implicit Biases: Real estate professionals and employers may consider including training on the many different forms that implicit biases take, including racial/ethnic, gender, age, beauty, geographic, and affinity biases to include a broader spectrum of potential basis in the real estate industry.
  • Measurements: Real estate employees and professionals should be informed on how implicit bias is measured and use that information to monitor progression. Employers and professionals can consider utilizing Harvard's Implicit Association Test to measure and monitor implicit bias.
  • Implicit Bias in the Real Estate Industry: Historically, covenants, conditions, and restrictions mandated discriminatory practices. While legislation has sought to address these practices, residual negative effects may be experienced through illegal practices such as racial steering and redlining. Real estate professionals can draw attention to the mechanisms through which implicit bias can manifest itself in the real estate industry, such as through appraisals and valuation, through the buying and selling processes, through steering clients to certain neighborhoods (or away from others), and through disparate treatment of renters or applicants based on vouchers, subsidies, or other sources of income.
  • Implementation: Training courses may work best when paired with strategies urging real estate professionals to recognize and unlearn potential biases. Real estate professionals and employers can consider implementing these strategies by conducting spontaneous implicit bias assessments and conducting simulations to assess and monitor implicit bias within their companies.

While the real estate industry is under heightened scrutiny, including by federal, state, and local enforcement agencies investigating potentially discriminatory real estate practices, there is not yet a uniform standard for satisfying the requirements of mandatory training. Employers and real estate professionals, however, can take steps to avoid potential liability, including by remaining attentive to whether potential basis exists in the workplace and instituting implicit bias training. Employers and real estate professionals can benefit from monitoring implicit bias internally to prevent potential fair housing violations.

Finally, employers and real estate professionals should be mindful if they operate in jurisdictions potentially banning anti-bias training. Some states, such as Florida, have passed laws that prohibit anti-bias training by private employers. (The Florida law has been block by a court on constitutional grounds.) Other states have passed or are considering legislation banning anti-bias training or training on divisive issues; these laws largely address public education and employment at present.

If you have any questions on the requirements or on resources for implicit bias or other fair housing training related to the real estate industry, please contact a Jackson Lewis attorney to discuss.

(Summer Associate Jennifer Quarters-Styles contributed to this article.)

©2022 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Focused on labor and employment law since 1958, Jackson Lewis P.C.'s 950+ attorneys located in major cities nationwide consistently identify and respond to new ways workplace law intersects business. We help employers develop proactive strategies, strong policies and business-oriented solutions to cultivate high-functioning workforces that are engaged, stable and diverse, and share our clients' goals to emphasize inclusivity and respect for the contribution of every employee. For more information, visit

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Jackson Lewis P.C.

Challenging OSHA Violations at Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission Is Worth the Effort

By Melanie L. Paul Jackson Lewis P.C. May 26 , 2023

It is more important than ever that employers understand the serious long-term, non-monetary consequences of settling or accepting Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) citations.

New Washington Law Regulates Warehouse Distribution Center Worker Quotas

By Kathryn J. Barry Jackson Lewis P.C. May 26 , 2023

A new Washington law regulating employers’ use of production quotas or production standards for employees working at warehouse distribution centers (House Bill 1762) will go into effect on July 1, 2024.

Sixth Circuit Adopts New Standard to Decide Whether to Send Notice to Potential FLSA Opt-Ins

By David R. Golder Jackson Lewis P.C. May 24 , 2023

In a highly anticipated decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has ruled it will not use the lenient, two-step procedure in deciding whether to authorize sending notice of a collective action to other workers under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

More From Real Estate

Florida Passes Law Restricting Foreign Ownership of Real Estate

By Brian Donnelly McDermott Will & Emery May 16 , 2023

The Florida Legislature recently passed Senate Bill 264 (SB 264), which Governor Ron DeSantis signed into law on May 8, 2023.

European Green Directives: Seeking Clarity for the Real Estate Market

By Dr. Johann-Frederik Schuldt Greenberg Traurig April 27 , 2023

Green directives on the energy performance of buildings, including energy performance certificate (EPC) ratings in the European Union and United Kingdom, are urging the European real estate industry to assess the costs of compliance.

No Spark Here: TTAB Refuses to Register Similar Mark for Real Estate Services

By Kat Lynch McDermott Will & Emery April 27 , 2023

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board’s refusal to register a mark due to the “close similarity” between the applied-for mark and a previously registered mark.

Featured Stories