SHARE

August 05, 2022

Pro Bono Appeal: Match The Punishment To The Crime

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

In 2018, police raided a known drug house in Kankakee County, Illinois, and found 19-year-old Latrell Franklin with 14 ecstasy pills and a bag of "green leafy substances" in his pockets. There was a gun in a downstairs closet, and police discovered scales and more bags of green leafy substances elsewhere in the home.

Latrell told the officers that he had bought the ecstasy from a 17-year-old friend who lived in the house and was there with him, but nothing else was his.

THE CHALLENGE:

The police decided not to charge the 17-year-old juvenile, so the bulk of the legal charges stemming from the raid fell on Latrell.

Rather than charging Latrell solely with possession of ecstasy, the state charged him with intent to distribute the pills and cannabis (which had not yet been legalized in Illinois), along with armed violence—because of the gun in the closet.

The green leafy substances were never tested, so the cannabis charge was dropped, but the prosecution still spent most of the trial focused on those substances. Although they never made a connection between the green leafy substances and Latrell, he was convicted on all charges and sentenced to 16 years in prison.

OUR OBJECTIVE:

To help clear a backlog of appeals cases, the Illinois Supreme Court started a pro bono appeals program allowing private attorneys, on a pro bono basis, to take on work typically handled by the State Appellate Defender.

Along with several other cases, Michael Weaver and a McDermott pro bono team took on Latrell's appeal, aiming to demonstrate that he had been overcharged and convicted of crimes he hadn't committed.

THE OUTCOME:

After briefing and oral argument, the Illinois Appellate Court agreed with that assessment. It overturned the jury verdict, vacating Latrell's convictions. For defense attorneys arguing similar cases, the outcome better defined and clarified what the state needs to prove in establishing an "intent to distribute" to sustain a conviction.

The outcome was never a certainty: Latrell had committed and admitted to the crime of possession, but that was not the crime he had been charged with. To successfully argue the appeal, the pro bono team painted a more accurate picture of the situation and demonstrated that the prosecution's charges and arguments at trial were legally out of bounds.

DIG DEEPER:

During the appeal, the pro bono team made several clarifying points:

First, it was prejudicial for the State to talk about the green leafy substances unrelated to the charges against Latrell. Some officers referred to them as "cannabis" and "marijuana" at trial, terms that had no basis in fact because the substances were never tested.

Second, the state never rebutted Latrell's testimony that the 14 ecstasy pills in his possession were for anything other than personal use.

Finally, because the state didn't establish the felony of intent to distribute, the armed violence charge—which requires the offender to be near a gun while committing an underlying felony—no longer applied.

Ultimately, the Court vacated all of the charges but remanded the armed violence conviction to the trial court to determine if sufficient evidence existed to proceed with that charge.

Learn more about our pro bono capabilities.

 

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From McDermott Will & Emery

Oil License Corruption Charges Don't Stick In Milan Court Of Appeal

By McDermott Will & Emery attorneys McDermott Will & Emery January 27 , 2023

In 2011, global oil company Shell and Italian state-owned oil company ENI struck a deal with the Nigerian government to jointly acquire the license to one of the most valuable oil blocks in Nigeria, known as Oil Prospecting License 245 (OPL 245).

This Week in 340B: January 17 - 23, 2023

By Emily Jane Cook McDermott Will & Emery January 26 , 2023

This weekly series provides brief summaries to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country.

IRS Releases Memorandum on Deducting Cryptocurrency Losses

By Andrew M. Granek McDermott Will & Emery January 26 , 2023

On January 13, 2023, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released a Chief Counsel Advice Memorandum (CCA 202302011) concluding that taxpayers cannot claim a deduction for cryptocurrency losses that have, absent a sale or other taxable disposition, substantially declined in value if such cryptocurrency continues to trade on at least one cryptocurrency exchange and has a value that is greater than zero.

More From State and Local Government

Treasury Updates Guidance, Easing the Use of Funds for Affordable Housing Development

By Georgi Banna Ballard Spahr August 05 , 2022

The U.S. Department of Treasury recently updated guidance on the American Rescue Plan Act’s (ARPA) State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) and Emergency Rental Assistance 2 (ERA2) programs.

Alternative Project Delivery Methods Authorized for Repairs at 25,000 NYC Public Housing Units

By William Estes Ballard Spahr July 11 , 2022

Hoping that faster construction methods can be combined with increased subsidies to undertake billions of dollars of desperately needed affordable housing renovations, New York’s Legislature has authorized the use of several alternative project delivery methods on some New York City affordable housing units. Contained in the NYC Public Housing Preservation Trust Act, the plan to use alternative construction methods is contingent on federal authorization of subsidies to provide ongoing support for units currently owned by the New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA).

Drumbeat Grows for Legislation Against PACs and Foreign Electoral Influence

By Kate A. Belinski Ballard Spahr February 23 , 2022

Legislators in the U.S. Congress, Arizona, and California have proposed legislation restricting U.S. subsidiaries of foreign corporations from making political contributions.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...