SHARE

July 08, 2022

New Chicago Ordinance on Sexual Harassment Takes Effect

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

The new Chicago Ordinance on sexual harassment, effective July 1, 2022, requires that an employer maintaining a business facility within the geographic boundaries of Chicago must have a written policy—including a conspicuously displayed notice poster in English and Spanish—documenting the prohibition of sexual harassment.

The written policy must include the following features:

  1. A statement that sexual harassment is illegal in Chicago.
  2. Definition of sexual harassment as defined in section 6-10-020, which adds that sexual harassment includes unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature and sexual misconduct, meaning any behavior of a sexual nature which also involves coercion, abuse of authority or misuse of an individual's employment position.
  3. Requirement that all employees participate in sexual harassment prevention training annually (minimum of one hour). Anyone supervising/managing employees must participate in a minimum of two hours of training annually.
  4. Requirement that all employees participate in one hour of bystander training annually.
  5. Examples of prohibited conduct that constitutes sexual harassment (the ordinance does not provide examples).
  6. Details on (1) how an individual can report sexual harassment, including instructions on how to make a confidential report with a form, to a manager, the employer's headquarters, the Human Resources department or another internal reporting mechanism; and (2) how legal services, including governmental, are available to employees who may be victims of harassment.
  7. Statement that retaliation for reporting sexual harassment is illegal in Chicago.

This written policy must be retained for five years. The policy must be provided in the employee's primary language within one week of their start date. When administering the required training, the employer can use the model sexual harassment prevention training program prepared by the State of Illinois required under 775 ILCS 5/2-109 or it may have its own prevention training program that is equal to or exceeds the Illinois law. Evidence of training, including slides and other materials, must be retained for five years.

Chicago recently released its model training slides and model written notices, which can be found here and here.

If McDermott can assist in any way to help you meet these new requirements, please contact your McDermott Employment lawyer or the authors listed below.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From McDermott Will & Emery

On the Road Again: Alternative Designs May Impact Trade Dress Functionality Analysis

By Kavya Rallabhandi McDermott Will & Emery May 25 , 2023

The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed and remanded a summary judgment ruling, finding that there were genuine disputes of material fact regarding whether the plaintiff’s alleged trade dress was functional and therefore excluded from trade dress protection.

Elevate the $: Geographic Isolation Helps Defeat Trademark Infringement Claim

By Kat Lynch McDermott Will & Emery May 25 , 2023

In a case between similarly named banks, the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit confirmed expert disclosure requirements, conducted a de novo likelihood of confusion analysis and ultimately upheld a finding of no trademark infringement.

First Circuit: Claim Preclusion Shouldn't Apply to Bar Claims Under VARA

By Hannah Cohen McDermott Will & Emery May 25 , 2023

Addressing for the first time whether federal res judicata law recognizes the alternative determinations doctrine, the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit determined that a plaintiff’s claims under the Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA) were not precluded by a previous action in which she brought a federal copyright claim against the defendant.

More From Employment Law

The New York Court of Appeals: A Triumph of Merit Selection

By Henry M. Greenberg Greenberg Traurig May 25 , 2023

The current court is a triumph of the merit selection process that New Yorkers voted for in 1977.

GT's The Performance Review Episode 20: All Secrets Revealed: Employee Investigations

By Philip I. Person Greenberg Traurig May 24 , 2023

In this episode, Sue Ann Van Dermyden, co-founder and senior partner at one of the nation’s top investigations firms, joins Philip Person and Ryan Bykerk to discuss the ins and outs of employee investigations.

NYC Passes Bill to Update Human Rights Law to Include Discrimination Based on Height, Weight

By Jerrold F. Goldberg Greenberg Traurig May 24 , 2023

On May 11, 2023, the New York City Council passed Intro 209-A, which would amend the New York City Human Rights Law to include prohibitions on discrimination based on height and weight.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...