July 26, 2022

UK Law Enforcement Identify Common Sanctions Evasion Tactics and Use of UK-Based 'Enablers'

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Subscribe now to get unlimited access to all OnPractice content. Your subscription is free.
Subscribe Now

On 12 July 2022, the UK's Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) and various other UK government agencies issued a red alert, in conjunction with the Joint Money Laundering Intelligence Taskforce (JMLIT), setting out various common evasion tactics and techniques the agencies suspect certain persons designated under the UK's financial sanctions regime use with the help of "UK enablers".

The red alert defines "enablers" as "individuals or businesses facilitating sanctions evasion and associated money laundering" and identifies a number of enabling "key professions", including lawyers, private family offices, accountants and wealth managers, estate agents, auction houses, and company directors.

The red alert includes the following suspected evasion tactics:

  • changes to beneficial ownership or corporate structures to non-Russian or dual national family members or associates, prior to or shortly after sanctions have been imposed
  • changes to ownership of a corporate holding to reduce ownership stakes to below the 50% threshold, shortly before or after sanctions designations
  • use of trust arrangements or complex corporate structures involving offshore companies
  • clients connected with a designated person seeking to move all assets to other financial institutions and closing their UK accounts
  • change of address and names for Russian entities in the lead up to the invasion of Ukraine
  • trust and company service providers offering nominees and trustee services to a designated person, family members or business associates
  • pooled accounts transferring funds to entities associated with a designated person
  • use of banks and financial organisations owned by close associates of a designated person
  • suspicious consulting invoices at exorbitant or clearly non-market rates
  • failures to undertake appropriate due diligence in relation to, for example: source of funds or wealth checks
  • holding companies based in offshore jurisdictions or those linked to assets in the former Soviet Union
  • identification of transactions by holding companies linked with a designated person with Swiss bank accounts and BVI / Cypriot legal persons
  • payments via fintechs owned in part by Russian national and / or others implicated in previous major trade-based money laundering schemes

There is significant pressure on professions and businesses to keep their houses in order. However, despite concerns as to resourcing within enforcement agencies, the cost of running afoul of sanctions regimes is evidenced by the reported arrests of at least 10 individuals from various sectors, including lawyers, estate agents and auction house employees, by the UK's National Crime Agency Kleptocracy Cell. Those involved in "key professions" should consider investing in due diligence processes and screening against the overlapping sanctions regimes and train staff to be vigilant to the tactics outlined above.


ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Greenberg Traurig

Data transfers from a controller in the EEA, to another controller in the EEA, to a processor outside of the EEA

By David A. Zetoony Greenberg Traurig August 02 , 2022

The following is part of Greenberg Traurig’s ongoing series analyzing cross-border data transfers in light of the new Standard Contractual Clauses approved by the European Commission in June 2021.

Workplace Safety Review: Episode 28 | Interview with Nadine Mancini

By Michael T. Taylor Greenberg Traurig August 01 , 2022

In this episode, Mike Taylor and Adam Roseman talk to Nadine Mancini, General Counsel for the federal Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission in Washington, D.C.

3rd Circuit Issues Practical Death Knell to Nationwide FLSA Collective Actions Involving Employers Not Subject to General Jurisdiction in Circuit

By James N. Boudreau Greenberg Traurig July 29 , 2022

On July 26, 2022, in a win for employers, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued a precedential opinion in Christa Fischer, et al. v. Federal Express Corp., et al, No. 21-1683, affirming a decision from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that refused to allow two opt-in plaintiffs to join a putative collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) because the proposed plaintiffs’ claims for unpaid overtime had no connection to Pennsylvania.

More From International Law

EU Sanctions Russia with 'Maintenance and Alignment' Package of Restrictive Measures

By Erik de Bie Greenberg Traurig July 26 , 2022

On July 21, 2022, the Council of the European Union adopted a new, seventh package of measures (Package) primarily intended to tighten existing economic sanctions targeting Russia, perfect their implementation, and strengthen their effectiveness.

UK Prohibits Certain Investment in Russia

By Annabel Thomas Greenberg Traurig July 22 , 2022

From 19 July 2022,1 it is a violation of UK financial sanctions for any person who knows or has reasonable cause to suspect that they are carrying out, directly or indirectly, certain investment activity in Russia.

Threat of ITC Exclusion Order Is Too Speculative to Constitute Irreparable Harm

By Alexander P. Ott McDermott Will & Emery July 21 , 2022

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by a federal district court denying a defendant’s motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin a parallel International Trade Commission (ITC) investigation against it.

Featured Stories