July 13, 2022

Japan Enacts Economic National Security Act

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all OnPractice content.
Register Now

On May 11, 2022, the Japanese Diet passed the Economic National Security Act (Law No. 43 of 2022) to protect Japan and its economic activities from security threats due to geopolitical risks around the world.

The Act consists of the five following chapters:

  1. Basic policy behind the Act (i.e., seamless implementation of several economic measures to ensure Japan's national security, keeping the measures minimal to prevent unnecessary impact on Japanese economic activities);

  2. Securing stable provision of critical materials necessary for sustaining Japanese nationals or that greatly affect economic activities;

  3. Securing stable provision of key infrastructure services to prevent interference by foreign parties that hold relevant infrastructure facilities;

  4. Assisting development of cutting-edge technologies;

  5. Suspending disclosure of certain patent applications involving sensitive inventions in connection with national security.

The Act will take effect over the next two years as each chapter is finalized.

Of the chapters above, chapters three and five are most relevant to foreign parties.

Chapter 3: Securing Stable Provision of Fundamental Infrastructure Services

This chapter establishes an approval system for the installation of material facilities in certain business areas, and for outsourcing of maintenance and administration of such material facilities in relation to the fundamental infrastructure of Japan.

1. Subject Business Areas: The industries in which installation or outsourcing of material facilities are subject to the Japanese government's prior approval are as follows:

a. Electricity

b. Gas

c. Petroleum refinery and petrol gas import

d. Water supply and drinking water supply

e. Railroad

f. Freight transportation

g. Shipping

h. International and domestic airlines

i. Airport operations and other public facilities operations

j. Telecommunications

k. Broadcasting

l. Postal

m. Banking, fund transfer, insurance, type 1 financial instruments business operations (securities broker/dealer), prepaid card issuance, and certain other financial businesses

n. Credit card issuance

2. Subject Operator: If a business operator (i) falls under one of the above areas, (ii) has a business that exceeds the standard (to be determined) set by the government, (iii) is specifically designated by the government, and (iv) will commence the following conduct, the operator needs to obtain prior government approval:

The Restricted Conduct comprises (a) installing a material facility from a third-party vendor (domestic or overseas) and (b) outsourcing maintenance and/or administration of a material facility to a third-party vendor (domestic or overseas).

3. Material Facilities: Material Facilities are any facilities, equipment, machines, and programs that are (i) critical for the Subject Operator to stably provide the services in the Subject Business Area, and (ii) potentially used by an overseas party to disrupt stable provision of such services.

4. Prior Approval: The Subject Operator must file a plan (the Plan) for installing the Material Facility or for maintenance/administration of the Material Facility with the Japanese government (specific ministry will be determined later, but most likely the Cabinet Office.) The review period is 30 days in principle, but it may be extended up to four months. A Subject Operator may not conduct Restricted Conduct without receiving prior government approval of the Plan.

5. Recommendation/Order: Upon the government's review of the Plan, the government may recommend that the Subject Operator alter or halt the Plan, and the Subject Operator must respond to the recommendation within 10 days. If the Subject Operator does not respond, the government may order to cease the businesses provided in the Plan.

Depending on changes to the geopolitical landscape and if the government predicts a Major Facility will disrupt the fundamental infrastructure of Japan, it may order to cease the businesses provided in an already approved Plan.

6. Penalty: If a Subject Operator (i) does not file a Plan or misrepresents the Plan, or (ii) does not honor the government's Order, the Subject Operator is subject to criminal penalty of up to two years in prison and/or a fine of up to 1 million yen. A representative of the Subject Operator is also subject to a fine of up to 1 million yen.

7. Effective Date: The designation of Subject Operators will be made within 18 months of May 11, 2022 (the Enactment Date), and the approval system will begin within 21 months of the Enactment Date.

Chapter 5: Suspending Disclosure of Certain Patent Applications

1. Patent applications in certain categories: Of the G20 countries, Japan is one of a few that does not set any exemption measures from the patent application disclosure principle. To prevent the patent application information from being diverted for military use, the Act sets forth an exemption measure from the disclosure principle for patent applications for inventions in certain business categories. The Act prohibits the use of the invention included in the subject patent application. The invention designated by the government may not proceed in the patent application process and may not be used by other parties without governmental approval.

2. Subject invention: An invention subject to the disclosure restriction may impact the security of the country or its people if disclosed to an outside party. The government will designate certain patent classifications (Designated Patent Classifications) in technology areas that may affect national security, like "weapons" and "ammunition and explosion." The government's designation of patent classifications must be released at most two years from the Enactment Date (exact time period not yet established).

Moreover, the patent application for any invention in the Designated Patent Classifications made within Japan must first be filed with the Patent Office of Japan. 

3. Review process for subject patent application: Once the Patent Office receives a patent application (the Subject Patent Application) that includes an invention in a Designated Patent Classification filed with the Patent Office, the office will send the Subject Patent Application to the Prime Minister's Office, which will then review the patent application's potential risk to national security and economic activities innovation, and decide whether to issue a Suspension Order. The order lasts one year and may be renewed annually.

4. Effects of Suspension Order: Once the Prime Minister's Office issues the Suspension Order,

a. the Subject Patent Application may not be disclosed to the public.

b. the review process of the Subject Patent Application is suspended, and thus, a patent will not be given to the Subject Invention.

c. Until the Suspension Order is retrieved, the filed Subject Patent Application may not be withdrawn.

d. Unless the Prime Minister's Office gives pre-approval, the applicant, and anyone with knowledge of the Suspension Order, may not implement the Subject Invention.

e. Sharing the Subject Invention is subject to government approval.

f. The Applicant may not file the same patent application outside of Japan.

5. Compensation for the suspension: Anyone affected by the Suspension Order, including the inventor and, in some cases, the patent licensee, may claim compensation from the government for ordinary loss caused by the suspension. The Prime Minister's Office determines the compensation amount. The person awarded the compensation may appeal the amount by filing a case with a court in Japan.

6. Penalty: Anyone who violates the Suspension Order is subject to up to two years of imprisonment and a 1 million yen fine. A representative of the Suspension Order is also subject to an up to 1 million yen fine.

7. Effective date: Measures provided in the chapter, such as suspending disclosure of certain patent applications, will take effect within two years of the Enactment Date.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Greenberg Traurig

California AG Announces Investigation of Mobile Apps' CCPA Compliance

By Gretchen A. Ramos Greenberg Traurig January 31 , 2023

On Jan. 27, 2023, the California Attorney General announced his office is investigating and sending letters to businesses in the retail, travel, and food industries with popular mobile apps that allegedly are not in compliance with the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) by failing to offer a consumer opt-out mechanism for sales, or honor rights requests submitted via authorized agents.

E2 Law Podcast: Episode 20 | Empire Environmental - Review of New York's Cap-and-Invest Program to Reduce Emissions and Achieve Climate Goals

By Steven C. Russo Greenberg Traurig January 27 , 2023

In this episode of Greenberg Traurig's E2 Podcast, attorneys Steven Russo, Zackary Knaub, and Jane McLaughlin discuss New York State’s cap-and-invest program to limit greenhouse gas emissions and share revenue with New Yorkers from disadvantaged communities to help cover utility bills, transportation costs, and decarbonization.

5 Trends to Watch: 2023 Data Privacy & Cybersecurity

By Gretchen A. Ramos Greenberg Traurig January 26 , 2023

While ransomware attacks have been on the rise since 2020, a recent trend has emerged where threat actors are bypassing ransomware malware and encryption tactics and going straight to data theft.

More From Financial Services and Banking

CFPB Says 'Show Me The (Consumer Unfriendly) Fine Print'

By Timothy A. Butler Greenberg Traurig January 25 , 2023

On Jan. 11, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released a proposed rule that would require certain nonbank financial companies subject to its supervisory jurisdiction to submit annual reports about their use of terms and conditions that attempt to waive or limit consumer rights and protections.

FINRA Files Amendments to Proposed Rule Change That Will Allow Remote Inspections

By William B. Mack Greenberg Traurig January 25 , 2023

Last summer, the Financial Regulatory Authority (FINRA) proposed a rule change to its supervision rule (FINRA Rule 3110) to allow member firms to conduct remote inspections of some or all branch offices and locations.

FCPA Year in Review 2022

By Cuneyt A. Akay Greenberg Traurig January 25 , 2023

In 2022, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) obtained nearly $1 billion in total fines and penalties related to Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) violations, making 2022 one of the top 10 highest grossing years with regard to enforcement penalties in the 45-year history of the FCPA.

Featured Stories