SHARE

June 16, 2022

Connecticut Family and Medical Leave Act Regulations in Final Review; Notices Required as of July 1

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

Key Takeaways

  • Confirmation that employees need only provide a “simple written statement” to take leave to care for “an individual related to the employee by blood or affinity whose close association is equivalent to the family relationships
  • Clarification that employers may continue to impose fitness-for-duty requirements on similarly situated employees and do not have to have a “one-size-fits-all” policy applicable to all employees regardless of circumstances; and
  • Explanation of the complaint process before the Connecticut Department of Labor or in court for employees who believe their rights under the Connecticut FMLA have been violated.

Over six months after the Connecticut Family and Medical Leave Act (Connecticut FMLA) took effect, proposed regulations are slated for consideration and approval by the Connecticut Legislative Regulation Review Committee (LRRC). With the exception of nonpublic elementary or secondary schools, all private employers with at least one employee in Connecticut are covered by the Connecticut FMLA as of January 1, 2022.

Key provisions of the proposed regulations include:

  • Confirmation that employees need only provide a "simple written statement" to take leave to care for "an individual related to the employee by blood or affinity whose close association is equivalent to the family relationships";
  • Clarification that employers may continue to impose fitness-for-duty requirements on similarly situated employees and do not have to have a "one-size-fits-all" policy applicable to all employees regardless of circumstances; and
  • Explanation of the complaint process before the Connecticut Department of Labor or in court for employees who believe their rights under the Connecticut FMLA have been violated.

If there are no further amendments to the proposed regulations, the LRRC is scheduled to issue its decision by July 7, 2022.

Notice to Employees

Beginning July 1, 2022, employers must provide notice to employees regarding:

  1. Employee entitlement to Connecticut FMLA and how it can be used;
  2. Employee opportunities to file for compensation with the Connecticut Paid Leave Authority;
  3. The prohibition on retaliation for interfering with or denying rights under the Connecticut FMLA; and
  4. Employee rights to file a complaint.

The notice must be provided to new employees on their date of hire. All existing employees must receive a copy of the notice on or before July 1, 2023. Then, the notice must be distributed to all employees annually.

Retaliation Prohibited

The Connecticut Legislature has amended the Connecticut FMLA to prohibit retaliation against an employee for seeking to obtain benefits from the Connecticut Paid Leave Authority.

***

There are circumstances in which an employee may seek paid leave benefits, despite being ineligible for Connecticut FMLA, or otherwise seek only paid leave benefits. Nearly all employees in Connecticut became eligible for paid leave benefits through the Connecticut Paid Leave Authority beginning January 1, 2022. This is a separate monetary benefit from the job-protected leave under the Connecticut FMLA.

Given the complexities involved, employers should consult with counsel and plan to evaluate any personnel decision concerning an individual who has applied for Connecticut paid leave benefits as if the employee requested job-protected leave.

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to answer inquiries and assist employers in their compliance efforts.


©2022 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Focused on labor and employment law since 1958, Jackson Lewis P.C.'s 950+ attorneys located in major cities nationwide consistently identify and respond to new ways workplace law intersects business. We help employers develop proactive strategies, strong policies and business-oriented solutions to cultivate high-functioning workforces that are engaged, stable and diverse, and share our clients' goals to emphasize inclusivity and respect for the contribution of every employee. For more information, visit https://www.jacksonlewis.com.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Jackson Lewis P.C.

Challenging OSHA Violations at Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission Is Worth the Effort

By Melanie L. Paul Jackson Lewis P.C. May 26 , 2023

It is more important than ever that employers understand the serious long-term, non-monetary consequences of settling or accepting Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) citations.

New Washington Law Regulates Warehouse Distribution Center Worker Quotas

By Kathryn J. Barry Jackson Lewis P.C. May 26 , 2023

A new Washington law regulating employers’ use of production quotas or production standards for employees working at warehouse distribution centers (House Bill 1762) will go into effect on July 1, 2024.

Sixth Circuit Adopts New Standard to Decide Whether to Send Notice to Potential FLSA Opt-Ins

By David R. Golder Jackson Lewis P.C. May 24 , 2023

In a highly anticipated decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has ruled it will not use the lenient, two-step procedure in deciding whether to authorize sending notice of a collective action to other workers under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

More From Labor Law

The End of AB 51?

By Charles O. Thompson Greenberg Traurig May 18 , 2023

On Feb. 15, 2023, the Ninth Circuit in Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta issued its ruling on the ongoing question of Assembly Bill (AB) 51’s enforceability in relation to arbitration agreements, where the court once again affirmed that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts AB 51.

Top Five Labor Law Developments for April 2023

By Jonathan J. Spitz Jackson Lewis P.C. May 10 , 2023

The National Labor Relations Board returned to its prior standard for analyzing the legality of disciplining employee misconduct related to protected concerted activity.

California Supreme Court to Have 'Last Word' on Viking River

By Lindsay E. Hutner Greenberg Traurig May 04 , 2023

The California Supreme Court will soon hear oral argument on the much-anticipated Adolph (Erik) v. Uber Technologies, Inc., (Uber), accepting Justice Sotomayor’s invitation in Viking River Cruises to have the “last word” on whether an employee forced to arbitrate their individual Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claims maintains statutory standing to pursue PAGA claims on a representative basis within the court system, based on violations other employees suffered.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...