SHARE

June 06, 2022

Illinois Excludes Employees Subject to CBA Provisions from 'One Day Rest in Seven' Requirements

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

Illinois had amended its "One Day Rest in Seven" Act (ODRISA) to impose additional meal period, day of rest, and notice requirements on employers, and to significantly increase the potential civil penalties for violations of the Act (see our article, Illinois Amends ‘One Day Rest in Seven' Law, With Significant Revisions). A companion bill to these amendments, signed by Governor J.B. Pritzker on May 27, 2022, adds to the list of employees exempt from the law's day-of-rest requirements those "for whom work hours, days of work, and rest periods are established through the collective bargaining process."

Since its original enactment, ODRISA has exempted from its day-of-rest requirements certain categories of employees, including but not limited to individuals employed in a "bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity or in the capacity of an outside salesman" as defined under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA); "supervisors," as defined under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA); and part-time employees who work 20 or fewer hours in a calendar week. The most recent amendment adds to this list employees subject to collective bargaining and tracks ODRISA's existing language concerning meal periods, which provides that the meal period requirement "does not apply to employees for whom meal periods are established through the collective bargaining process." For those employers with employees represented by a labor organization, this amendment may provide a basis to exempt bargained-for employees from the day-of-rest requirement. As with the other recent ODRISA amendments, the CBA exemption becomes effective on January 1, 2023.

If you have any questions about ODRISA, its amendments, or any other Illinois wage and hour law, please contact one of the authors of this article or another Jackson Lewis attorney.


©2022 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Focused on labor and employment law since 1958, Jackson Lewis P.C.'s 950+ attorneys located in major cities nationwide consistently identify and respond to new ways workplace law intersects business. We help employers develop proactive strategies, strong policies and business-oriented solutions to cultivate high-functioning workforces that are engaged, stable and diverse, and share our clients' goals to emphasize inclusivity and respect for the contribution of every employee. For more information, visit https://www.jacksonlewis.com.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Jackson Lewis P.C.

New Jersey's Expanded Mini-WARN Law to Take Effect April 2023

By Timothy D. Speedy Jackson Lewis P.C. January 13 , 2023

After a two-year delay, the amendment to the New Jersey Millville-Dallas Airmotive Plant Job Loss Notification Act, the state’s mini-WARN law, will take effect on April 10, 2023.

A Deeper Dive Into FTC's Proposed Non-Compete Rule

By Clifford R. Atlas Jackson Lewis P.C. January 10 , 2023

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) proposed a new rule that, if made final, would (at least on its face) effectively prohibit non-compete agreements other than in very limited circumstances.

Guidance on ADA Accommodations and Medical Restrictions' 'Plain Meaning' From Federal Appeals Court

By Brian L. McDermott Jackson Lewis P.C. January 10 , 2023

The federal appeals court in Chicago has provided helpful guidance on employers’ obligation to accommodate qualified individuals’ medical restrictions under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in a case involving a correctional officer.

More From Wage and Hour Litigation

Judge Tosses First Amendment Defense In Yuga Labs V. Ryder Ripps

By Mioko C. Tajika Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti January 24 , 2023

On December 16, 2022, a federal district judge in California denied artist Ryder Ripps’s and his partner’s anti-SLAPP motion and motion to dismiss in a closely monitored action filed against them by Yuga Labs, Inc. (“Yuga”), the creator behind the monumentally successful Bored Ape Yacht Club (“BAYC”) NFTs.

5 Trends to Watch in 2023 International Arbitration

By Joseph J. Mamounas Greenberg Traurig January 19 , 2023

To meet demand for more flexible and timely ways to achieve dispute resolution, some clients are turning to emergency arbitration procedures as ways to not only preserve the status quo but also obtain an early assessment of the merits (through the lens of the likelihood of success).

Antitrust M&A Snapshot | Q4 2022

By Alexandra Lewis McDermott Will & Emery January 19 , 2023

Penguin Random House’s planned acquisition of rival Simon & Schuster was blocked by Judge Florence Pan of the US District Court for the District of Columbia on November 21.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...