June 10, 2022

New SEC Rule Mandates Electronic Filing of Form 144s and "Glossy" Annual Reports

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Subscribe now to get unlimited access to all OnPractice content. Your subscription is free.
Subscribe Now

On June 3, 2022, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments to Rule 101 of Regulation S-T that eliminate the option for issuers and filing persons to file a number of forms in paper format. The amendments mandate that issuers and filing persons electronically submit the following forms on EDGAR:

  • Form 144 for sales of securities of issuers subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
  • "Glossy" annual reports to security holders
  • Form 6-K filings[1]
  • Notices of exempt solicitations and exempt preliminary roll-up communications
  • Filings made by multilateral development banks
  • Certifications made pursuant to Section 12(d) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rule 12d1-3 that a security has been approved by an exchange for listing and registration.


FORM 144

The amendments have important implications for Form 144 filers as the SEC is looking to increase transparency and make these filings more accessible to investors, analysts and other market participants. According to data cited by the SEC, less than 1% of Form 144s submitted are done so electronically. The balance of Form 144s are either submitted in paper format or via email by virtue of the filing relief initially adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic.[2] The paper forms are not digitized by the SEC but are instead kept in its Public Reading Room in Washington, DC. Handwritten and offline, paper Form 144s are difficult for the public to access, track and analyze. Third-party service providers routinely scan the paper filings and make them available to their subscribers. However, the SEC noted that these third-party services are subscription based and not generally accessible to the public without charge. The SEC also noted the lag between the time the filings are made and when they become available via third-party service providers, with several days' lag being the norm. Form 144 will now be an online fillable document similar to Forms 3, 4 and 5, making all filings machine readable and easily accessible online.

Of particular note to filing persons, in order to submit a Form 144 electronically, they will need to obtain EDGAR access codes, a process that typically requires 48 to 72 hours lead time. Several commentators to the original rule proposal noted this increased compliance burden, much of which will be borne by the brokerage firms that execute trades on their clients' behalf. However, the SEC concluded that the benefit of greater transparency outweighed the burden on filing persons and their advisors.

Filers often submit Form 144s in tandem with trades executed in 10b5-1 plans. Although these amendments increase transparency for such filers, other proposed amendments relating to 10b5-1 plans, including the anticipated mandatory "cooling off period" and prohibition against overlapping plans, have not yet been adopted.


The newly adopted amendments also mandate issuers to electronically submit their "glossy" annual reports to the SEC. Historically, issuers have been required to submit their "glossy" annual reports in paper format. In 2016, SEC staff adopted interpretive guidance that allowed issuers to satisfy their delivery obligations by posting their "glossy" annual reports on their corporate websites. Contemporaneously with the effectiveness of the new rules, the interpretive guidance will be withdrawn and, while issuers may continue to post their "glossy" annual reports online, doing so will not satisfy their SEC delivery obligations. Going forward, issuers will need to electronically submit a PDF of their "glossy" annual reports on EDGAR.


The SEC is also making technical changes to how issuers submit Form 11-K financial statements and any accompanying notes. The amendments require that Form 11-K financial statements and accompanying notes be filed using Inline XBRL. The change brings Form-11-K financial statements in line with the requirements already in place for financial information in Forms 10-K, 20-F and 40-F.


The amendments will become effective 30 days after being published in the Federal Register. However, the SEC is providing a transition period to allow first-time EDGAR filers to apply for their filing codes and to allow traditionally paper filers to prepare to submit the following documents electronically on EDGAR:

  • All documents newly required to be submitted electronically: Filers have six months after the amendments' effective date to submit all documents that are newly mandated to be submitted electronically (except for Form 144).
  • Form 144: The requirement to file Form 144s electronically will commence six months from the date of publication in the Federal Register of the SEC release that adopts the version of the EDGAR Filer Manual addressing updates to Form 144. (Note: The SEC will consider adoption of the relevant version of the EDGAR Filer Manual that addresses updates to Form 144 in September 2022. Publication in the Federal Register would occur thereafter.)
  • Form 11-K Financial Statements: Filers have three years after the amendments' effective date to comply with the use of Inline XBRL for 11-K financial statements and accompanying notes.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From McDermott Will & Emery

Proposals to Reform the UK Data Protection Regime

By Sharon Lamb McDermott Will & Emery June 15 , 2022

On 10 May 2022 and as part of the Queen’s speech, which sets out the programme of legislation for the forthcoming parliamentary session, the government announced proposals to table a Data Reform Bill (the Bill) to reform the UK’s data protection regime and to diverge from European GDPR1. This follows the consultation by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) consultation released last September.

Preparing for the Demise of Roe v. Wade and the Criminalization of Abortion in Some US States: Practical Considerations for a Post-Roe World

By David Quinn Gacioch McDermott Will & Emery June 14 , 2022

Sometime in the next several weeks, the Supreme Court of the United States will issue its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (Dobbs). Based on the draft majority opinion authored by Justice Samuel Alito that was leaked to Politico in early May, there is a significant chance that the Court will overrule Roe v. Wade (Roe) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (Casey) by holding that there is no federal constitutional right to obtain an abortion and leaving individual states free to substantially restrict abortion or prohibit abortion altogether.

Can't Hide Behind Minor Clerical Error to Escape Willful Infringement Verdict

By Cecilia Choy, Ph.D. McDermott Will & Emery June 09 , 2022

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court decision correcting a clerical error in a claim. Pavo Solutions LLC v. Kingston Technology Company, Inc., Case Nos. 21-1834 (Fed. Cir. June 3, 2022) (Lourie, Prost, Chen, JJ.)

More From Financial Services and Banking

NYDFS Becomes First US Financial Regulator to Issue Stablecoin Expectations to Virtual Currency Industry

By Michael A. Berlin Greenberg Traurig June 22 , 2022

On June 8, 2022, the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) issued a new Regulatory Guidance, setting foundational criterial for USD-backed stablecoins used by DFS-regulated entities. This represents the first U.S. state agency to regulate issuers of stablecoins. Generally, issuers that currently issue U.S.-dollar-backed stablecoins under DFS supervision are expected to come into compliance with the Regulatory Guidance within three months. This GT Alert summarizes the Regulatory Guidance.

How Smart Is Your Smart Contract?

By Chih-Hsun (Tim) Lin Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti June 14 , 2022

As some recent incidents have shown, sometimes smart contracts might not be “smart” (i.e., flawless) enough to achieve what people intend them to achieve, and sometimes even an unintended error in smart contracts could result in substantial, unbearable losses to developer teams and/or investors.

Half A Loaf Is Not Enough: Second Circuit Sustains Fraud Claim For Failure To Disclose SEC Investigation

By Eric Orsic McDermott Will & Emery June 06 , 2022

Companies under US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigation focus on marshaling the facts, defenses and related strategies during the course of the investigation and making presentations to the enforcement staff. However, there is also a parallel issue that companies often grapple with: whether the investigation should be publicly disclosed. In general, public companies under investigation are not required to disclose the existence of the investigation to the public. However, even without an independent duty to disclose, case law dictates that if a company speaks on an issue, it has a duty to tell the whole truth.[1]

Featured Stories