SHARE

May 25, 2022

US Trade Representative Requests Comments for Section 301 Duties

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

Key Takeaways

  • The four-year review of the Section 301 tariffs on China begins this summer and USTR has requested comments for the first two tranches of products.

Manufacturers in the U.S. should take note of a new request for comment from the United States Trade Representative as a lack of support may lead to removal of the tariffs and surge in unfairly priced imports.

What Are the Section 301 Duties?

In 2018 and 2019, the Trump administration placed 25% duties (301 duties) on approximately $250 billion worth of Chinese imports. These duties remain in place today and are reviewed every four years as required by the Trade Act of 1974.

Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 allows the Office of the United States Trade Representative to enforce U.S. rights under trade agreements and address unfair foreign barriers to U.S. exports. Section 301 authorizes USTR to take various actions, including increased tariffs on goods imported into the U.S. from the country under investigation. The Trump administration conducted a Section 301 investigation into China's economic practices and imposed tariffs on Chinese goods imported into the U.S. market for (1) forced technology transfer requirements; (2) cyber-enabled actions to acquire U.S. IP and trade secrets illegally; (3) discriminatory and nonmarket licensing practices; and (4) state-funded strategic acquisition of U.S. assets.

However, recent statements by officials seem to suggest that the Biden administration is considering lifting the 301 duties or allowing them to expire.

U.S. Trade Representative's Request for Comments

The four-year review of the Section 301 tariffs on China begins this summer. USTR published a notice in the Federal Register on May 5, 2022, requesting comments from U.S. manufacturers for the first two tranches of products to continue the tariffs. The deadline for comments is July 5 for tranche 1 and August 22 for tranche 2. Any products for which USTR does not receive comments will not advance to the second stage of review. Put another way, any product for which there are no comments from a U.S. manufacturer supporting the Section 301 tariffs, USTR will likely remove the tariff later this fall.

Impact of Removing the Section 301 Duties

The Biden administration is exploring modifying or terminating the Section 301 tariffs in part to help with inflation. However, should the duties be removed then Chinese imports will become 25% cheaper virtually overnight and U.S. manufacturers will likely face a surge in imports.

China has also imposed lockdowns on Shanghai and Beijing to help combat COVID-19. A side effect of the lockdowns has been a slowdown in the internal Chinese supply chain and exports, along with congestion at Chinese ports. As the lockdowns end, Chinese factories will be looking to make up for lost time by increasing production and exports. 

Filing comments to support Section 301 tariffs with USTR by July 5 may provide meaningful relief for U.S. manufacturers that have previously been injured due to competition with unfairly priced Chinese imports.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney

Ninth Circuit Refuses to Boot FLSA Claims: Time Spent Logging On is Compensable

By Christian Antkowiak Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney November 10 , 2022

Is an employer obligated to pay employees for the time spent booting up and signing into their computers prior to clocking in?

Protecting Your Brand - Amazon's Brand Registry Program

By Bassam N. Ibrahim Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney November 09 , 2022

Trademarks are a useful tool for brand protection.

SEC Adopts Final Incentive Compensation Clawback Rules

By Jennifer R. Minter Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney November 04 , 2022

On October 26, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules that will require listed companies to disclose and implement policies to “claw back” or recover incentive compensation paid as a result of erroneously reported financial information that is subject to a required accounting restatement.

More From Manufacturing

Federal Contractors Given Opportunity to Object to Release of EEO-1 Diversity Reports Under FOIA Exemption 4

By Robert D. Pecchio Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney October 26 , 2022

Time is up for federal contractors to object to the Center for Investigative Reporting’s (CIR) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking the disclosure of their diversity reports.

ENABLERS Act Proposes to Expand Definition of 'Financial Institution'; Impose BSA/AML Requirements on Professional Service Providers

By Richard M. Cutshall Greenberg Traurig October 13 , 2022

On July 14, 2022, the U.S. House of Representatives passed bipartisan legislation that, if passed by the Senate and signed into law, would expand the types of institutions required to comply with AML requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).

Insights from the Fifth National Forum on Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI) and the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency

By Daniel B. Pickard Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney September 26 , 2022

The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA), of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), is responsible for (among other things) ensuring that foreign ownership, control, or influence (FOCI) of government contractors does not compromise U.S. national security interests.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...