SHARE

April 19, 2022

Updated Federal Forms Part 1: EEOC Additional Gender Marker Option

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Subscribe now to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content. Your subscription is free.
Subscribe Now

The Federal Government has updated some standard forms employers are probably used to seeing. In this two-part blog series, we will identify the changes in these new forms, starting first with the EEOC's addition of a gender marker option to its voluntary self-identification process and passport applications. Next week, we will discuss the changes to Form I-9.

On March 31, 2022, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") announced that it would be providing the option to select a nonbinary "X" gender marker during its voluntary self-identification questions, which are part of the intake process for filing a charge of discrimination. The option to mark "X" will appear in the demographic questions relating to gender in the online public portal for inquiries when filing a charge of discrimination, as well as within the Online Spanish Initial Consultation Form and Pre-Charge Inquiry Form that are sometimes used in lieu of the portal. The option to mark "X" will also be included in the EEOC's new charge of discrimination form. In addition, the form will include the prefix "Mx" within its list of prefix options.

The EEOC will incorporate the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics proposal for how to define "X," which has two parts:

(1) "Unspecified," which promotes privacy for individuals who prefer not to disclose their gender identity;

(2) "Another gender identity," which promotes clarity and inclusion for those who wish to signify that they do not identify as male or female.

This policy builds off the EEOC's enforcement of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which among other protections, shields workers from discrimination based on sex.

Similarly, beginning on April 11, 2022, all U.S. citizens will be able to select an "X" as their gender marker on their U.S. passport application(s).

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Dickinson Wright PLLC

401(k) Plan Sponsors - It Doesn't Pay To Ignore Your Plan's Definition Of Compensation

By Jordan Schreier Dickinson Wright PLLC June 06 , 2022

One of the most common errors in 401(k) plan administration continues to be a mismatch between a plan’s definition of compensation and the actual compensation taken into account for plan purposes despite this problem being common enough for the IRS to include it in its “401(k) Plan Fix-It Guide”.

All My Exes Live In Texas: Texas' New Laws In The Wake Of #METOO And A Growing Economy

By Adrian Acosta Dickinson Wright PLLC May 23 , 2022

With Texas growing and business booming, the Lone Star State has changed its laws that affect employers in response to the #MeToo movement.

UPDATE: FEC Candidate Loan Repayment Limitation Ruled Unconstitutional in Supreme Court Decision

By Katherine N. Reynolds Dickinson Wright PLLC May 18 , 2022

On May 16, 2022, the United States Supreme Court ruled that limiting the repayment of candidate loans to their own campaign to $250,000 (codified under 52 U.S.C. § 30116(j)) is unconstitutional. The Plaintiffs, Ted Cruz for Senate and Senator Ted Cruz, filed suit against the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”), stating that the repayment limitation unconstitutionally infringes the First Amendment rights of the Senator, the Campaign, and any individuals who might seek to make post-election contributions.

More From Employment Law

Pennsylvania's New Requirements for Tipped and Salaried Employees: Common Questions

By Stephanie J. Peet Jackson Lewis P.C. August 01 , 2022

Some of the most-common questions that employers have asked about these new rules are discussed in this special report. (For an overview, see our article, Pennsylvania Regulatory Commission Approves Expansive Tipped Employee Regulations.)

Workplace Safety Review: Episode 28 | Interview with Nadine Mancini

By Michael T. Taylor Greenberg Traurig August 01 , 2022

In this episode, Mike Taylor and Adam Roseman talk to Nadine Mancini, General Counsel for the federal Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission in Washington, D.C.

3rd Circuit Issues Practical Death Knell to Nationwide FLSA Collective Actions Involving Employers Not Subject to General Jurisdiction in Circuit

By James N. Boudreau Greenberg Traurig July 29 , 2022

On July 26, 2022, in a win for employers, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued a precedential opinion in Christa Fischer, et al. v. Federal Express Corp., et al, No. 21-1683, affirming a decision from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that refused to allow two opt-in plaintiffs to join a putative collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) because the proposed plaintiffs’ claims for unpaid overtime had no connection to Pennsylvania.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...