SHARE

May 03, 2022

Expediting Examination - Pre-Assessment Letters

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Subscribe now to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content. Your subscription is free.
Subscribe Now

The Canadian Trademarks Office (TMO) has taken several steps to reduce the backlog of trademark applications awaiting examination that now exceeds 39 months for national applications.

The measures include the following:

  • Fast-tracking applications that use statements of goods and services that are pre-approved by the TMO;
  • Accelerating examination upon request of applicants in certain limited circumstances, with a focus on counterfeit goods and online enforcement;
  • Hiring and training of additional trademark examiners;
  • Reducing the availability of extensions of time in examination; and
  • Decreasing the number of times arguments can be submitted against a given objection raised in examination.

Using pre-approved statements of goods and services in trademark applications may currently reduce examination wait times by several months. The Goods and Services Manual (GSM) has been expanded to include over 100,000 entries.

Using pre-approved statements of goods and services in trademark applications may currently reduce examination wait times by several months.

The TMO has recently launched a new automated review of all unexamined applications in Canada, resulting in "pre-assessment letters" being issued to applicants or their agents.

The review will identify if amendments to the statement of goods and services is potentially required, as well as flag any missing or improper Nice Classification information, or both. A pre-assessment letter will issue permitting an applicant to:

  • File an amendment to its application to adopt a pre-approved statement of goods and services in replacement of the statement at issue or delete the goods and/or services at issue; and/or
  • Address any misclassification issues.

Responding to the pre-assessment is voluntary; no formal deadline is set by which an applicant must respond to a pre-assessment letter.

If a pre-assessment does not uncover any potential flaws, the applicant will receive notification that the application will be examined at an accelerated rate similar to that of applications containing pre-approved statements of goods and services.

Rising Fees

The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) has also started a new consultation on fee increases for patents, trademarks, industrial designs, integrated circuit topographies, and copyrights. CIPO plans to publish these changes within the next year formally and for them to take effect by January 1, 2024.

The fee increases are expected to be around 25% in most categories.

For example, government fees for filing trademarks will be going up almost 29% compared to current rates, as will fees to file Statements of Opposition and requests for trademark cancellation proceedings. Similarly, government fees for a patent application by a regular applicant will be going up 25%. The fee increase is concerning to patent practitioners as CIPO's statistics show that the number of applications has been decreasing since 2018.

The Toronto IP team is actively contributing to this consultation and will be working with national organizations to provide relevant commentary. Given the changes, we encourage reviewing IP portfolios in Canada to take advantage of the current lower fees before these changes take effect.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Dickinson Wright PLLC

401(k) Plan Sponsors - It Doesn't Pay To Ignore Your Plan's Definition Of Compensation

By Jordan Schreier Dickinson Wright PLLC June 06 , 2022

One of the most common errors in 401(k) plan administration continues to be a mismatch between a plan’s definition of compensation and the actual compensation taken into account for plan purposes despite this problem being common enough for the IRS to include it in its “401(k) Plan Fix-It Guide”.

All My Exes Live In Texas: Texas' New Laws In The Wake Of #METOO And A Growing Economy

By Adrian Acosta Dickinson Wright PLLC May 23 , 2022

With Texas growing and business booming, the Lone Star State has changed its laws that affect employers in response to the #MeToo movement.

UPDATE: FEC Candidate Loan Repayment Limitation Ruled Unconstitutional in Supreme Court Decision

By Katherine N. Reynolds Dickinson Wright PLLC May 18 , 2022

On May 16, 2022, the United States Supreme Court ruled that limiting the repayment of candidate loans to their own campaign to $250,000 (codified under 52 U.S.C. § 30116(j)) is unconstitutional. The Plaintiffs, Ted Cruz for Senate and Senator Ted Cruz, filed suit against the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”), stating that the repayment limitation unconstitutionally infringes the First Amendment rights of the Senator, the Campaign, and any individuals who might seek to make post-election contributions.

More From Intellectual Property

Major Influencers Under the Loupe - Dutch Media Authority Publishes New Policy Rule Effective July 1

By Wouter van Wengen Greenberg Traurig June 23 , 2022

Success comes with a price. As of July 1, 2022, influencers with more than 500,000 followers (“Major Influencers”) will be under Dutch Media Authority (Commissariaat van de Media) supervision due to a new Policy Rule. As such, Major Influencers will be required to comply with additional advertising rules from the Dutch Media Act (Mediawet). This GT Alert reviews the reason for the new Policy Rule (Beleidsregel kwalificatie commerciële mediadiensten op aanvraag 2022)1, the conditions to qualify as a Major Influencer, and the additional advertising rules and implications. 

Can't Hide Behind Minor Clerical Error to Escape Willful Infringement Verdict

By Cecilia Choy, Ph.D. McDermott Will & Emery June 09 , 2022

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court decision correcting a clerical error in a claim. Pavo Solutions LLC v. Kingston Technology Company, Inc., Case Nos. 21-1834 (Fed. Cir. June 3, 2022) (Lourie, Prost, Chen, JJ.)

Drink Up, but Not with Lehman Brand

By Paul Devinsky McDermott Will & Emery June 09 , 2022

In the context of an opposition proceeding, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a Trademark Trial & Appeal Board (Board) refusal to register a trademark based on likelihood of confusion with a famous but expired mark, notwithstanding the applicant’s assertion of abandonment of the mark by the original registrant. Tiger Lily Ventures Ltd. v. Barclays Capital Inc., Case Nos. 21-1107;- 1228 (Fed. Cir. June 1, 2022) (Lourie, Bryson, Prost, JJ.)

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...