May 09, 2022

Operators, Start Your Engines; But Beware of Sanctions

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Subscribe now to get unlimited access to all OnPractice content. Your subscription is free.
Subscribe Now

Less than a month has passed since the launch of the regulated iGaming market in Ontario, and the Ontario regulator has already handed down its first pair of penalties. On Tuesday, May 3, 2022, the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario announced its first two monetary penalties to iGaming Operators - both stemming from alleged failures to comply with advertising and marketing Standard 2.05.

BetMGM Canada's penalty totaled $48,000 for alleged failure to comply with Standards 2.04 and 2.05. Meanwhile, their peer PointsBet Canada was served a penalty totaling $30,000 for alleged failure to comply with Standards 2.05.

Both Standard 2.04 and 2.05 relate to an Operator's marketing and advertising. Standard 2.04 requires that an Operator's marketing (including their advertising and promotions) be truthful, not mislead players, or misrepresent products. Meanwhile, Standard 2.05 prohibits the broad public advertising of bonuses and inducements.

BetMGM Canada's alleged breach of Standard 2.04 came from an April 10th tweet that stated, "the more money you put in per bet, the higher your chance is of winning." Standard 2.04 includes a number of minimum requirements, including a prohibition against implying that the chances of winning increase the more one spends.

BetMGM Canada was also found to be communicating gambling inducements to a broad audience via a string of tweets ranging from April 4th - April 11th. The tweets included offers for bonuses and free spins. Similarly, PointsBet Canada allegedly included gambling inducements on posters on Ontario GO trains from April 4th - April 21st.

While Standard 2.05 does not prohibit the use of inducements, bonuses, or credits, it does limit the ways that Operators can promote them. As opposed to other jurisdictions, Ontario is one of the only jurisdictions in the world to prohibit broad public advertising of bonuses and other gambling inducements.

AGCO's message here is clear: tweets are just as much a form of advertising as anything else and must be compliant with the standards. Likewise, these two penalties serve as a reminder to all Operators that marketing materials that might work in other jurisdictions might not work in Ontario.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Dickinson Wright PLLC

401(k) Plan Sponsors - It Doesn't Pay To Ignore Your Plan's Definition Of Compensation

By Jordan Schreier Dickinson Wright PLLC June 06 , 2022

One of the most common errors in 401(k) plan administration continues to be a mismatch between a plan’s definition of compensation and the actual compensation taken into account for plan purposes despite this problem being common enough for the IRS to include it in its “401(k) Plan Fix-It Guide”.

All My Exes Live In Texas: Texas' New Laws In The Wake Of #METOO And A Growing Economy

By Adrian Acosta Dickinson Wright PLLC May 23 , 2022

With Texas growing and business booming, the Lone Star State has changed its laws that affect employers in response to the #MeToo movement.

UPDATE: FEC Candidate Loan Repayment Limitation Ruled Unconstitutional in Supreme Court Decision

By Katherine N. Reynolds Dickinson Wright PLLC May 18 , 2022

On May 16, 2022, the United States Supreme Court ruled that limiting the repayment of candidate loans to their own campaign to $250,000 (codified under 52 U.S.C. § 30116(j)) is unconstitutional. The Plaintiffs, Ted Cruz for Senate and Senator Ted Cruz, filed suit against the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”), stating that the repayment limitation unconstitutionally infringes the First Amendment rights of the Senator, the Campaign, and any individuals who might seek to make post-election contributions.

More From Hospitality and Lodging

Biden Uses Emergency Powers to Pause New Solar Import Tariffs—Frequently Asked Questions

By Jeffrey A. Chester Greenberg Traurig June 10 , 2022

On June 6, 2022, President Biden issued the Declaration of Emergency and Authorization for Temporary Extensions of Time and Duty-Free Importation of Solar Cells and Modules from Southeast Asia (emergency declaration), which provides for the importation of solar panels and cells from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam free of certain duties for a two-year period to ensure “the United States has access to a sufficient supply of solar modules to assist in meeting our electricity generation needs.”

New rules of the game in consumer law

By Dr. Viola Bensinger Greenberg Traurig June 09 , 2022

On May 28, 2022, changes to various laws took effect that will help lead to innovations in consumer information obligations, the implementation of discount campaigns, and the design of online marketplaces and price comparisons. The changes indicate that non-compliance may in some cases result in severe regulatory penalties.

CFPB Circular 2022-03: Complex Lending Algorithms Cannot Excuse Failure to Provide Specific, Principal Reasons for an Adverse Credit Determination

By Tonya M. Esposito Greenberg Traurig June 07 , 2022

On May 26, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the Bureau or CFPB) issued its third Circular, emphasizing that creditors must adhere to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) and Regulation B, even when they employ complex algorithms, sometimes referred to as uninterpretable or “black-box” models, to render credit decisions. The Circular explains that companies must provide an applicant with the precise reasons for the denial of a credit application or adverse action, even if the creditor company uses complex credit algorithm models that do not allow even the creditor itself to “accurately identify[] the specific reasons for denying credit or taking other adverse actions.”

Featured Stories