April 12, 2022

HHS Announces Provider Relief Fund Late Reporting Pathway

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Subscribe now to get unlimited access to all OnPractice content. Your subscription is free.
Subscribe Now

Beginning on April 11, 2022, providers that failed to satisfy Provider Relief Fund (PRF) Period 1 or Period 2 reporting deadlines may apply to submit a late report based on one of six extenuating circumstances, including miscommunication and illness. This announcement comes after the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) notified thousands of recipients in March 2022 that they had to return non-compliant funds, which prompted the American Medical Association, Medical Group Management Association and other provider organizations to strongly urge additional reporting time in a March 31, 2022, letter to HRSA.


Provider Relief Fund Reporting Requirements
Providers that received $10,000 or more in aggregated General and Targeted Distribution PRF payments must report on the use of funds in accordance with HRSA PRF reporting requirements. Providers that fail to satisfy reporting requirements may be excluded from receiving or retaining future PRF payments, including applicable Phase 4 payments. HRSA has also published a fact sheet regarding consequences of reporting noncompliance.

The PRF Period 1 reporting deadline for funds received between April 10, 2020, and June 30, 2020, was September 30, 2021 (with a November 30, 2021, grace period). The Period 2 reporting deadline, related to funds received between July 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020, was March 31, 2022. Further details regarding the five PRF reporting periods, reporting deadlines and time periods in which recipients may use funds are outlined below. Notably, HRSA recently added a Period 5, which covers more recent distributions paid received from January 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022. Reports for Period 5 are due September 30, 2023.

  Payment Received Period
(Payments Exceeding $10,000 in Aggregate Received)
Period of Availability Reporting Time Period
Period 1 April 10, 2020, to June 30, 2020 January 1,2020, to June 30, 2021 July 1, 2021, to September 30, 2021*
Period 2 July 1 2020, to December 31, 2020 January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021 January 1, 2022, to March 31, 2022
Period 3 January 1, 2021, to June 30, 2021 January 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022 July 1, 2022, to September 30, 2022
Period 4 July 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021 January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022 January 1, 2023, to March 31, 2023
Period 5 January 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022 January 1, 2020, to June 30, 2023 July 1, 2023, to September 30, 2023

*Grace period ended on November 30, 2021.

Request to Report Late Due to Extenuating Circumstances
As announced, the agency will notify noncompliant providers with details regarding the late report application process after the applicable PRF reporting period closes. All requests are subject to HRSA approval and must be accompanied by an attestation regarding the occurrence of an allowable extenuating circumstance, outlined below.

Applications to submit late reports for Period 1 must be submitted to HRSA by April 22, 2022, at 11:59 pm EDT. The submission deadline for late reporting requests for Period 2 has not been announced yet.

Each request must be accompanied by an attestation and "clear and concise explanation" demonstrating that the provider experienced an allowable extenuating circumstance. While the application does not require the submission of supporting documentation, recipients should consider keeping a record of the explanation and supporting documentation along with the organization's other PRF use, submission and compliance records.

Allowable extenuating circumstances include the following:

  • Severe illness or death of the provider or key staff member responsible for reporting that hindered the timely report submission
  • Natural disaster occurring during or close to the reporting deadline that damaged records or information technology
  • Failure to receive reporting communications due to incorrect email or mailing address on file with HRSA that prevented the recipient from receiving reporting instructions prior to the deadline
  • Technical submission failure for organizations that registered and prepared reports, but did not take the necessary final step of clicking "submit"
  • Internal miscommunication or errors regarding the individual authorized or expected to submit a report for the recipient or the registered PRF point of contact in the portal
  • Incomplete Targeted Distribution report submissions if a parent organization completed all General Distribution reports, but a Targeted Distribution was not reported on by the subsidiary recipient

Providers will have 10 days from the date the late report approval notice is received to submit a report in the PRF Reporting Portal. This timeframe is much shorter than the 60-day timeframe requested by the American Medical Association. Providers whose request is denied must return funds associated with reporting noncompliance. Recipients may not use the late reporting process to request an opportunity to make edits or adjustments to submitted reports. Providers that need assistance with revising submitted reports should contact the Provider Support Line at +1 866 569 3522.

HRSA strongly encourages providers to complete their reports in the PRF Reporting Portal by the original deadlines outlined in the June 11, 2021, Post-Payment Notice of Reporting Requirements to ensure compliance with applicable terms and conditions.

Upcoming Reports and Audits
Period 3 PRF reports for funds received between January 1, 2021, and June 30, 2021, must be submitted by September 30, 2022. Many providers that have expended $750,000 or more in PRF monies may have audits covering prior reporting periods due around this time as well. For more information, see our OTS here and visit the HRSA Independent Audit Requirement Fact Sheet.

Providers should be mindful that American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Fund payments are subject to slightly different requirements regarding use among related organizations, and recipients must certify under the ARP Rural Terms and Conditions that they will retain the payment with the provider(s) associated with the applicable subsidiary or billing TIN. The ARP Rural and PRF Phase 4 payments also require disclosure of certain mergers and acquisitions. For more information, see the HRSA Ownership Changes Fact Sheet.

Additional details regarding PRF requirements and HRSA interpretative guidance is available on the HRSA PRF websitePRF Terms and Conditions website, and PRF FAQ pages.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From McDermott Will & Emery

New York City's Wage Transparency Law to Take Effect November 1, 2022

By Christina S. Dumitrescu McDermott Will & Emery May 06 , 2022

On January 15, 2022, the New York City Council enacted Local Law 32 of 2022 (Wage Transparency Law or Law) to amend the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) to require that most employers include compensation data in their job advertisements. The Law was supposed to take effect on May 15, 2022, however, it faced criticism over a number of ambiguities, including undefined penalties. In response, on April 28, 2022, the New York City Council passed an amendment to the Wage Transparency Law. Among the biggest changes is that employers now have until November 1, 2022—more than six months—to ensure compliance with the Law’s requirements. If Mayor Eric Adams signs the Law, which he is expected to do, New York City will become the second jurisdiction in the country (the first being Colorado) to require employers to include minimum and maximum potential salary amounts for open positions in job postings.

NAIC Continues to Refine Multiyear Work Plan to Expand Scrutiny of Holding Company Act Filings

By Andrea T. Best McDermott Will & Emery May 05 , 2022

In our report published on April 26, 2022, we discussed the New York Department of Financial Services’ (NYDFS) Circular Letter No. 5 in which it reminded the industry that acquiring less than 10% of an insurer’s voting securities does not necessarily mean that the acquirer (1) is not a “controller” and (2) does not have to submit a Form A application to the insurer’s home state or domestic regulator seeking approval for the change of control. This topic is one of several related matters that various committees, task forces and working groups of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) are studying and will continue to study over a multiyear period (the Project).

European Union, United Kingdom Propose New Sanctions Against Russia, Including Ban on Certain Services

By Raminta Dereskeviciute McDermott Will & Emery May 04 , 2022

As Russia continues to escalate its military operations in Ukraine, the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom (UK) unveiled details of new sanctions against Russia. This alert summarises the proposed restrictions.

More From Health Care

Fifth Circuit Decision Could Undermine Constitutionality of HHS Civil Money Penalty Laws

By Robert P. Charrow Greenberg Traurig May 20 , 2022

On May 18, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued its decision in Jarkesy v. Securities and Exchange Comm’n, in which it examined the constitutionality of an agency civil money penalty enforcement proceeding.

Employers, Employees, & HIPAA, Oh My!

By Emma Trivax Dickinson Wright PLLC May 16 , 2022

Oftentimes, healthcare entities’ employees are also patients of the healthcare entity, creating a dual role as employer and employee as well as doctor and patient. But what can an employer do when they need to access an employee’s medical records? Are these medical records treated differently than non-employee patients? Throughout the last few years, we have seen an increasing number of healthcare entities with these exact questions.

OIG Permits FQHC to Loan Smartphones to Patients to Receive Telehealth Services

By Samantha R. Gross Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr May 06 , 2022

On April 28, 2022, the Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) published Advisory Opinion 22-08 in which the OIG declined to impose sanctions against a federally qualified health center (“Requestor”).

Featured Stories