SHARE

FEATURED STORY April 19, 2022

OSHA Proposes Expanding Electronic Recordkeeping Rule to Add Smaller Employers

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Subscribe now to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content. Your subscription is free.
Subscribe Now

In 2016, OSHA promulgated an electronic recordkeeping rule, Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses Rule, which required employers with establishments of at least 250 employees to electronically submit their OSHA Form 300 (Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses) and OSHA Form 301 (Injury and Illness Incident Report) to OSHA, unless they are exempted from maintaining these documents. Employers challenged the rule because of concerns that information about individuals' injuries and illnesses would be made public and that the agency would use the electronic records to publicly shame employers by publishing their injury and illness records on OSHA's website, which could be viewed by news media, unions, industry competitors, and the public.

As a result of the privacy concerns with electronic submission of the OSHA Form 300 and OSHA Form 301, in 2018, the Trump Administration modified the original rule to require employers to electronically submit only summary data on OSHA Form 300A (Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses).

The proposed rule not only seeks to return to the rule as originally promulgated in 2016, but it would expand the number of employers that must comply with it by dropping the threshold number of employees from 250 to 100 and by updating the list of employers that are designated in high-hazard industries based on their industry code categorized by the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). The rule would include two separate lists of employers that are required to electronically submit workplace injury information. Appendix A will be updated to identify high-risk designated industries using the 2017 NAICS. Employers with more than 20 employees would be required to submit their Form 300A if they are on this list. Appendix B would be a new list designed to identify employers with at least 100 employees that have had a three-year average rate of recordable cases of at least 3.5 cases per 100 full-time employees. Employers included in Appendix B will be required to submit certain information from Forms 300, 301, and 300A once a year. All employers on Appendix A are included in Appendix B.

If finalized, the 2022 rule would reverse the 2018 rollback of the proposal limiting electronic reports to summary data only by reinstating the requirement to provide the more detailed injury and illness data in OSHA Forms 300 and 301. The reports will be required even when employers have complied with OSHA standards, and employers will have to identify themselves on reports by name. Addressing previously raised privacy concerns in its proposal, OSHA said, "[R]ecent advancements in technology [that] have reduced the risk that information that reasonably identifies individuals directly, such as name and contact information, will be disclosed to the public." The agency said it hopes that expanding the electronic reporting mandate will provide analysis of "establishment-specific, case-specific injury and illness data" that will enable the agency to focus compliance efforts on particular employers and industries. OSHA confirmed that it intends to make aspects of the information publicly available.

Employers and other interested stakeholders may submit comments through May 31, 2022, online using Docket No. OSHA-2021-0006 in the Federal eRulemaking Portal.


©2022 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Focused on labor and employment law since 1958, Jackson Lewis P.C.'s 950+ attorneys located in major cities nationwide consistently identify and respond to new ways workplace law intersects business. We help employers develop proactive strategies, strong policies and business-oriented solutions to cultivate high-functioning workforces that are engaged, stable and diverse, and share our clients' goals to emphasize inclusivity and respect for the contribution of every employee. For more information, visit https://www.jacksonlewis.com.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Jackson Lewis P.C.

South Carolina Anti-Vaccine Mandate Law: Implications for Private Employers

By T. Chase Samples Jackson Lewis P.C. May 16 , 2022

South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster has signed into law House Bill 3126, which has implications for public and private employers that continue to require employees in South Carolina to be vaccinated against COVID-19.

Transferring Talent from Facilities Abroad as Option for Skilled Workers for Manufacturing Companies

By Nicola Ai Ling Prall Jackson Lewis P.C. May 13 , 2022

Using treaty of commerce and navigation visas as a possible option for manufacturing companies searching for talent is a great way for manufacturing companies to explore. Companies with affiliates abroad have another option: the L-1 visa.

Chicago Adopts New Sexual Harassment Prevention Obligations for Employers

By Nadine C. Abrahams Jackson Lewis P.C. May 13 , 2022

The Chicago City Council has created new employer obligations to provide training to employees and supervisors on sexual harassment prevention and how bystanders should respond to sexual harassment.

More From Electronics

Workplace Safety Review: Episode 25 | Interview with Dr. John Howard

By Michael T. Taylor Greenberg Traurig May 16 , 2022

In this episode, Adam Roseman talks to Dr. John Howard, the director of NIOSH and the administrator of the World Trade Center Health Program in the US Department of Health and Human Services.

OSHA Turns Up the Heat on Enforcement With New Heat Hazard Emphasis Program

By Melanie L. Paul Jackson Lewis P.C. April 18 , 2022

This National Emphasis Program (NEP) covers 70 “high risk industries,” and it will result in increased inspections and enforcement activity across the targeted industries just in time for spring.

California Employers Can Make Reasoned Choices as State Reduces Formal Workplace Masking Requirements

By David A. Dixon Littler March 03 , 2022

Effective March 1, 2022, there is no longer a hard requirement under the Cal/OSHA statewide Emergency Temporary Standard (CA ETS) or any other statewide requirement for employers to require unvaccinated persons (or fully vaccinated persons) to mask indoors at work.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...