April 12, 2022

Top Five Labor Law Developments for March 2022

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all OnPractice content.
Register Now
  1. Major League Baseball and the players' union reached agreement on a collective bargaining agreement, ending the lockout. After a nearly 100-day lockout, MLB and the Major League Baseball Players Association reached a deal on a five-year collective bargaining agreement (CBA). The CBA deal came in time for the season to start just a week later than originally scheduled, with Opening Day set for April 7. Despite MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred previously announcing the cancellation of the first two weeks of games, the League will play a full 162-game schedule, with the cancelled games being made up with double headers. Highlights of the deal include raising the starting salary for players from $570,000 to $780,000 by 2026, expanding a bonus pool to reward top players not yet eligible for salary arbitration, holding a lottery for the top six picks in the amateur player draft, raising the thresholds for the competitive balance tax, and expanding the postseason playoffs to include 12 teams. Additionally, the long-awaited universal designated-hitter rule will become effective for the 2022 season, meaning National League pitchers will no longer be required to bat. Many are viewing the deal as a much-needed compromise to address the League's financial woes as the sport's popularity has waned in recent years. In 2019, ballpark attendance fell to 68.5 million, the lowest since at least 2006.
  1. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) General Counsel (GC) issued a complaint seeking to overturn a Trump-era decision holding that misclassifying employees as independent contractors is not a stand-alone unfair labor practice. The NLRB GC has issued a complaint against five trucking, warehouse, and logistic companies in Southern California, alleging their misclassification of drivers as independent contractors rather than employees violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Deco Logistics d/b/a Container Connection, 21-CA-272323 (complaint issued March 17, 2022). The complaint alleges that the misclassification of the drivers prevented them from engaging in concerted activity protected under the NLRA. Independent contractors are not "employees" under the NLRA and, thus, not afforded the protections of the law, including the right to form a union. Moreover, independent contractors generally do not have other, non-NLRA legal protections, such as workers' compensation or unemployment insurance. In Velox Express Inc., 368 NLRB No. 61 (2019), the Trump-era NLRB found that misclassifying employees, in and of itself, does not constitute a violation of the NLRA. The GC is seeking an order forcing the companies to reclassify drivers as employees and to pay them consequential damages suffered because of their misclassification, among other remedies.
  1. The NLRB granted withdrawal of a Trump-era complaint related to revocation of union dues authorization. A divided NLRB panel permitted a charging party to withdraw charges filed against her employer after it rejected her request to revoke her dues deduction authorization. AT&T Services, 371 NLRB No. 82 (Mar. 18, 2022). The charges were filed during the administration of former NLRB GC Peter Robb, a Trump appointee, while the Board was comprised of a Republican majority. Robb's office sought to expand the time periods when union members can revoke their dues deduction authorizations. Established Board law at the time permitted limiting revocation of dues deduction authorizations to once a year. Frito Lay, 243 NLRB 137 (1979). Having received reimbursement for the disputed dues from the union and ending her employment with the company, the charging party requested to withdraw the charge in December 2021. The current Biden NLRB agreed, in a 2-1 decision, to permit withdrawal (thus avoiding a decision on the merits of the case), finding that further prosecution would be a waste of resources. The case is illustrative of the holdover cases from the Trump Administration that the NLRB is still processing.
  1. The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) proposed significant changes to the Davis-Bacon Act and related federal labor laws. The DOL has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) seeking to revise Davis-Bacon Act (DBA) regulations. The DBA requires payment of local prevailing wages and benefits on contracts with federal agencies and the District of Columbia for constructing, altering, or repairing public buildings or works. Congress has also incorporated prevailing wage requirements into more than 70 statutes, including the new Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. Much of the NPRM focuses on revising the process by which prevailing wage and benefits are set by the DOL. The DOL proposed returning to the definition of prevailing wage used from 1935 to 1983, where, absent a wage rate paid to a majority of workers in a particular classification, a wage rate will be used as the prevailing wage if it is paid to at least 30 percent of those workers. Because unions are more likely to participate in the survey process for determining prevailing wage rate than are non-union contractors, the new rule should swing the prevailing wage toward the generally higher union rates. The DOL also proposed providing itself broader authority to adopt state or local wage determinations where certain criteria are met. While there are some changes that benefit contractors, the NPRM includes mostly changes that will be beneficial to unions and employees, in line with the Biden agenda to overhaul federal labor law in favor of workers.
  2. Tech workers at the New York Times voted to unionize in a landslide election. A group of approximately 600 full-time and part-time engineers, analysts, designers, and project and product managers at the New York Times has voted to be represented by the Times Tech Guild, an affiliate of the NewsGuild of New York, itself affiliated with the Communications Workers of America. A preliminary tally of ballots by the NLRB had the union winning in a landslide, with 404 of 492 votes counted being cast for the union. The bargaining unit — believed to be the largest unit of tech workers in the country — is responsible for building and maintaining the Times' website and online applications. The Times had previously denied the union's request for voluntary recognition, and it unsuccessfully argued to the Board that the election should be for a smaller unit because the different classifications in the group sought by the union did not adequately share a community of workplace interests. The win for the union is indicative of fast-growing organizing activity for news organizations (more common among editorial employees), even though union membership is down nationwide.

©2022 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Focused on labor and employment law since 1958, Jackson Lewis P.C.'s 950+ attorneys located in major cities nationwide consistently identify and respond to new ways workplace law intersects business. We help employers develop proactive strategies, strong policies and business-oriented solutions to cultivate high-functioning workforces that are engaged, stable and diverse, and share our clients' goals to emphasize inclusivity and respect for the contribution of every employee. For more information, visit

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Jackson Lewis P.C.

Labor Department Releases New Guidance on Agency Enforcement of PUMP for Nursing Mothers Act

By Patricia Anderson Pryor Jackson Lewis P.C. May 19 , 2023

The U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division (WHD) has published guidance for agency officials responsible for enforcing the “pump at work” provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), including those enacted under the 2022 Providing Urgent Maternal Protections for Nursing Mothers Act (PUMP Act).

EEOC Classwide Subpoena Based on Individual Allegations Too Broad, Federal Appeals Court Rules

By Stephanie L. Adler-Paindiris Jackson Lewis P.C. May 17 , 2023

Denying the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) request to enforce a subpoena that would have expanded the agency’s investigation on a classwide basis, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has held the EEOC did not have the authority to expand the investigation beyond the individual allegations in the charge.

More From Labor Law

The End of AB 51?

By Charles O. Thompson Greenberg Traurig May 18 , 2023

On Feb. 15, 2023, the Ninth Circuit in Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta issued its ruling on the ongoing question of Assembly Bill (AB) 51’s enforceability in relation to arbitration agreements, where the court once again affirmed that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts AB 51.

Top Five Labor Law Developments for April 2023

By Jonathan J. Spitz Jackson Lewis P.C. May 10 , 2023

The National Labor Relations Board returned to its prior standard for analyzing the legality of disciplining employee misconduct related to protected concerted activity.

California Supreme Court to Have 'Last Word' on Viking River

By Lindsay E. Hutner Greenberg Traurig May 04 , 2023

The California Supreme Court will soon hear oral argument on the much-anticipated Adolph (Erik) v. Uber Technologies, Inc., (Uber), accepting Justice Sotomayor’s invitation in Viking River Cruises to have the “last word” on whether an employee forced to arbitrate their individual Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claims maintains statutory standing to pursue PAGA claims on a representative basis within the court system, based on violations other employees suffered.

Featured Stories