April 07, 2022

SEC Chair Continues Push to Regulate Digital Asset Markets

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all OnPractice content.
Register Now

At a speech to the University of Pennsylvania Law School's Capital Markets Association on April 4, 2022, SEC Chair Gary Gensler took the opportunity to again promote his strong desire to add greater regulation and oversight to the digital asset and cryptocurrency markets. While reminding the audience of the SEC's mission to protect investors, facilitate capital formation, and maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets, Gensler added two additional policy considerations: guarding against illicit activity and maintaining financial stability. In this light, Gensler focused his remarks on three specific areas of concentration for the SEC: platforms, stablecoins, and crypto tokens.


Gensler first addressed crypto-based trading and lending platforms, both centralized and decentralized. Specifically, he noted he has asked the SEC Staff to:

  • Propose regulations for the registration and oversight of crypto platforms, consistent with that of traditional regulated exchanges, including Alternative Trading Systems, in order to safeguard market integrity, protect against fraud, and facilitate capital formation;
  • Address registration and regulation of platforms where the trading of securities and non-securities is intertwined, including coordination with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in connection with platforms that might trade crypto-based security tokens and some commodity tokens, irrespective of agency jurisdiction;
  • Consider segregation of custody for centralized crypto trading platforms that hold customer assets; and
  • Given that many crypto trading platforms also act as market makers, consider segregation of market-making functions.


Gensler argued that stablecoins generally are not used in commerce (at least in the United States) and otherwise are not legal tender. Nonetheless, he asserts that stablecoins compete with bank deposits and money market funds, thus raising significant policy concerns: financial stability, use for illicit activity, and the need for investor protection. Gensler argued for more oversight of the use of stablecoins given concerns relating to anti-money laundering, tax compliance, sanctions, and the like, as well as perceived conflicts of interest and market integrity issues. It was unclear from his statements as to whether he has tasked the SEC Staff with a proposal in this area or will otherwise defer to the Department of Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board, although he noted the SEC's particular interest with respect to money market funds and other types of securities.


The greatest area of SEC enforcement to date has been in connection with the offer and sale of crypto tokens that implicate the Supreme Court's 1946 "Howey Test." Like his predecessor, Jay Clayton, Gensler asserted that most crypto tokens will pass the Howey Test as investment contracts, highlighting the use of these instruments to raise funds from the public with the expectation that an ecosystem will then be built to support the token and draw users to the project. It is here that Gensler made clear his goal to get crypto tokens that are securities registered with the SEC with the same "market integrity rulebook" as other securities.

In concluding his remarks, Gensler noted that the "robust" investor protection regime currently existing within the traditional U.S. markets should be applied to the crypto market and, by doing so, regulatory arbitrage and loopholes should be eliminated. The SEC has not publicized a timeline for rule proposals in this area. However, given the Biden administration's expectation that a coordinated regulatory approach to digital assets should be on the president's desk by September 2022, the next few months may be interesting indeed.

In addition, Gensler's stated intention to regulate cryptocurrency trading platforms as securities broker dealers may create a federal and state regulatory turf battle over who gets to license, regulate, and supervise such platforms because (i) the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency for at least five years has been trying to implement a national "fintech charter," (ii) approximately 50 state financial regulatory authorities presently regulate cryptocurrency trading platforms under their respective state money services business codes, and (iii) the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network has anti-money laundering regulatory authority over all cryptocurrency trading platforms. Many of these federal and state authorities will want to preserve and, in some cases, expand their existing regulatory dominion over digital asset trading firms, regardless of Gensler's intention.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Greenberg Traurig

California AG Announces Investigation of Mobile Apps' CCPA Compliance

By Gretchen A. Ramos Greenberg Traurig January 31 , 2023

On Jan. 27, 2023, the California Attorney General announced his office is investigating and sending letters to businesses in the retail, travel, and food industries with popular mobile apps that allegedly are not in compliance with the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) by failing to offer a consumer opt-out mechanism for sales, or honor rights requests submitted via authorized agents.

E2 Law Podcast: Episode 20 | Empire Environmental - Review of New York's Cap-and-Invest Program to Reduce Emissions and Achieve Climate Goals

By Steven C. Russo Greenberg Traurig January 27 , 2023

In this episode of Greenberg Traurig's E2 Podcast, attorneys Steven Russo, Zackary Knaub, and Jane McLaughlin discuss New York State’s cap-and-invest program to limit greenhouse gas emissions and share revenue with New Yorkers from disadvantaged communities to help cover utility bills, transportation costs, and decarbonization.

5 Trends to Watch: 2023 Data Privacy & Cybersecurity

By Gretchen A. Ramos Greenberg Traurig January 26 , 2023

While ransomware attacks have been on the rise since 2020, a recent trend has emerged where threat actors are bypassing ransomware malware and encryption tactics and going straight to data theft.

More From Financial Services and Banking

IRS Releases Memorandum on Deducting Cryptocurrency Losses

By Andrew M. Granek McDermott Will & Emery January 26 , 2023

On January 13, 2023, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released a Chief Counsel Advice Memorandum (CCA 202302011) concluding that taxpayers cannot claim a deduction for cryptocurrency losses that have, absent a sale or other taxable disposition, substantially declined in value if such cryptocurrency continues to trade on at least one cryptocurrency exchange and has a value that is greater than zero.

CFPB Says 'Show Me The (Consumer Unfriendly) Fine Print'

By Timothy A. Butler Greenberg Traurig January 25 , 2023

On Jan. 11, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released a proposed rule that would require certain nonbank financial companies subject to its supervisory jurisdiction to submit annual reports about their use of terms and conditions that attempt to waive or limit consumer rights and protections.

FINRA Files Amendments to Proposed Rule Change That Will Allow Remote Inspections

By William B. Mack Greenberg Traurig January 25 , 2023

Last summer, the Financial Regulatory Authority (FINRA) proposed a rule change to its supervision rule (FINRA Rule 3110) to allow member firms to conduct remote inspections of some or all branch offices and locations.

Featured Stories