April 06, 2022

U.S. Supreme Court Reinstates Trump-Era Water Rule Pending Appeal

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all OnPractice content.
Register Now

The U.S. Supreme Court stayed a ruling today that blocked implementation of a Trump-era water quality rule narrowing the authority of state and tribal authorities to reject projects that would violate state or tribal water quality standards.

Under the Clean Water Act, states have the authority to ensure that federal agencies do not issue permits for projects that violate state or tribal water quality standards. At issue is the Environmental Protection Agency's 2020 Section 401 Certification Rule which restricts the ability of states and tribes to block projects such as pipelines by withholding approval under the Clean Water Act. The 2020 rule, among other things, limited the scope of state and tribal 401 Certifications to evaluation of compliance with certain defined "water quality requirements." It also provided a one-year deadline for a state or tribe to act on a request for certification.

Judge William Alsup, of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, vacated the rule in 2021. Eight states, led by Louisiana, and several energy industry groups intervened to defend the rule and requested the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit stay implementation of Judge Alsup's ruling pending appeal. The Ninth Circuit denied that request.

In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court today agreed to halt a lower court judge's order throwing out the rule. The Court's ruling allows a Ninth Circuit appeal and potential Supreme Court petition for writ of certiorari to play out.

In January 2021, President Biden directed federal agencies to review regulations issued during the previous Administration related to the protection of public health and the environment. In June 2021, the EPA announced that it had decided to propose revisions to the 2020 rule through a new rulemaking effort. The EPA has stated that it expects to publish a proposed revised rule in the spring of 2022 with a final revised rule to be promulgated in early 2023.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Ballard Spahr

New York Restricts Automated Decision Making in Employment

By Timothy Dickens Ballard Spahr August 29 , 2022

Businesses operating in New York City should be aware of a local law addressing the use of automated employment screening and decision-making tools coming into effect on January 1, 2023.

Status Update: Federal Contractor Vaccine Mandate Injunction Narrowed

By Lila A. Sevener Ballard Spahr August 29 , 2022

On August 26, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit narrowed the nationwide injunction of Executive Order 14042, which requires federal contractors and employees who work on or in connection with a covered federal contract, or share a workplace with another employee who works on or in connection with such contracts, to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19.

Unions Cannot Force OSHA to Issue Permanent COVID Standard

By Shannon D. Farmer Ballard Spahr August 26 , 2022

On August 26, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit turned back efforts by a group of unions seeking to force the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to quickly issue a permanent rule establishing protections for healthcare workers from COVID-19.

More From Environmental Law

Schedule A I-140: Fast-Track Green Card for Nurses and Physical Therapists

By Caterina Cappellari Greenberg Traurig May 26 , 2023

Most employment-based permanent residency applications require the applicant to go through the PERM labor certification process where the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) certifies that there are not sufficient U.S. workers able, available, and qualified to fill a position.

Supreme Court Issues Decision Sharply Limiting Clean Water Act Jurisdiction over Wetlands

By Bernadette M. Rappold Greenberg Traurig May 26 , 2023

Sometimes the most monumental Supreme Court decisions spring from the most modest facts.

Attorney Fees Awards Under the Clean Streams Law

By David Mandelbaum Greenberg Traurig May 24 , 2023

In February, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided that the Environmental Hearing Board could award attorney fees and litigation costs to a prevailing third-party appellant under the Clean Streams Law.

Featured Stories