SHARE

February 14, 2022

Three Ways To Ensure Text Messages Are Relevant In Custody Cases

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

Key Takeaways

  • Make sure to print out all the text messages so that the message clearly shows the date and time. If no date is indicated, make sure to write down the date when the message occurred and the time, and promptly send it to your attorney so the date and time can be recorded when submitting the texts as evidence.
  • Hundreds of text messages (just like a stack of emails) are not going to be read by the judge.

You have hundreds of text messages between you and the other parent. You hand them all over to your lawyer, expecting the lawyer to be ecstatic that you can show every cancellation of parenting time, refusal to take the child to the doctor when sick, and general uncooperativeness. Yet, after pouring through them, the attorney looks up and advises that they probably will not make a big difference in the ultimate disposition of your custody case. "Why?" you ask with some bewilderment. How can this possibly be? It's all right there, message after message. To make your text message relevant, consider the following three tips:

  1. Include the date and time stamps. Text messages, once screened shot, are often without date and time stamps.  Without a date and time stamp, there is no ability to show when the message occurred and therefore lacks the foundational evidence needed to admit the messages at trial. Make sure to print out all the text messages so that the message clearly shows the date and time. If no date is indicated, make sure to write down the date when the message occurred and the time, and promptly send it to your attorney so the date and time can be recorded when submitting the texts as evidence.
  2. Limit the number. Hundreds of text messages (just like a stack of emails) are not going to be read by the judge. Make the most impact, not by the sheer quantity of messages, but instead by choosing a few that prove the point you are trying to make. A few well-chosen text messages will be more effective than submitting pages of screenshots that require the judge to go through them to try and understand the point you are making.
  3. Keep the string of text messages intact. Another common problem is the failure to include all the text messages within the conversation. While it is important to limit the number of messages you want the court to read, you also do not want to leave a message out. Otherwise, it will look as if you are only telling a part of the story.

Following the above steps will help ensure that the text messages you want to use in your case will actually be admitted into evidence and read by the judge.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Dickinson Wright PLLC

401(k) Plan Sponsors - It Doesn't Pay To Ignore Your Plan's Definition Of Compensation

By Jordan Schreier Dickinson Wright PLLC June 06 , 2022

One of the most common errors in 401(k) plan administration continues to be a mismatch between a plan’s definition of compensation and the actual compensation taken into account for plan purposes despite this problem being common enough for the IRS to include it in its “401(k) Plan Fix-It Guide”.

All My Exes Live In Texas: Texas' New Laws In The Wake Of #METOO And A Growing Economy

By Adrian Acosta Dickinson Wright PLLC May 23 , 2022

With Texas growing and business booming, the Lone Star State has changed its laws that affect employers in response to the #MeToo movement.

UPDATE: FEC Candidate Loan Repayment Limitation Ruled Unconstitutional in Supreme Court Decision

By Katherine N. Reynolds Dickinson Wright PLLC May 18 , 2022

On May 16, 2022, the United States Supreme Court ruled that limiting the repayment of candidate loans to their own campaign to $250,000 (codified under 52 U.S.C. § 30116(j)) is unconstitutional. The Plaintiffs, Ted Cruz for Senate and Senator Ted Cruz, filed suit against the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”), stating that the repayment limitation unconstitutionally infringes the First Amendment rights of the Senator, the Campaign, and any individuals who might seek to make post-election contributions.

More From Health Care Law

This Week in 340B: March 7 - 13, 2023

By Emily Jane Cook McDermott Will & Emery March 15 , 2023

This weekly series provides brief summaries to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country.

Trending in Telehealth: February 27 - March 5, 2023

By Ashley Ogedegbe McDermott Will & Emery March 13 , 2023

Trending in Telehealth is a new series from the McDermott Digital Health team in which we highlight state legislative and regulatory developments that impact the healthcare providers, telehealth and digital health companies, pharmacists, and technology companies that deliver and facilitate the delivery of virtual care.

District Court Vacates Provisions of No Surprises Act Final Rule

By Debra Curtis McDermott Will & Emery March 10 , 2023

On February 6, a US district court in Texas vacated provisions of the No Surprises Act final rule related to the independent dispute resolution (IDR) process for determining payment for out-of-network services.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...