SHARE

March 04, 2022

Utah Poised to Enact Consumer Privacy Law

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

Key Takeaways

  • The Act’s applicability would make it narrower than any currently enacted state privacy law to date.
  • The Act provides consumers with the now well-known rights of notice, access, portability and deletion.
  • Like other laws, the Utah Consumer Privacy Act allows consumers to opt-out of the use of their information for certain purposes, including targeted advertising and the sale of personal information.

On March 3, 2022, the Utah House of Representatives unanimously passed a consumer privacy bill which the Utah Senate passed earlier this year. The bill, entitled the Utah Consumer Privacy Act, still has several hurdles to jump through before becoming law. Leaders from both legislative chambers will need to provide their signatures before the 2022 session adjournment on March 4, 2022; following those signatures, Utah Governor Spencer J. Cox has 20 days to sign or veto the bill before it becomes law. Despite these remaining hurdles, the bill is widely expected to become the fourth comprehensive state consumer privacy law in the United States and the first such bill to become law in 2022.

 

In Depth


The Utah Consumer Privacy Act would apply to businesses who:

  1. Conduct business in Utah or produce a product or service targeted to Utah residents;
  2. Have an annual gross revenue of over $25 million; and
  3. Either (i) control or process the personal data of at least 100,000 residents or (ii) derive over 50% of its gross revenue from the "sale" of personal data and controls or processes personal data of at least 25,000 residents.

The Act's applicability would make it narrower than any currently enacted state privacy law to date. And as with other state laws, the Act contains broad exceptions for certain entities and data categories, including higher education institutions, nonprofits, and information and entities regulated by both the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA).

The Act, which is scheduled to take effect on December 31, 2023, includes many of the same rights, obligations and exceptions that have become common in other consumer privacy laws and proposals:

  • The Act provides consumers with the now well-known rights of notice, access, portability and deletion. These rights, however, are limited by reasonable business-use exemptions, such as detecting fraud and complying with a company's legal obligations. Notably, the Act does not provide consumers with the right to correction.
  • Like other laws, the Utah Consumer Privacy Act allows consumers to opt-out of the use of their information for certain purposes, including targeted advertising and the sale of personal information. Unlike other state laws, the Utah Consumer Privacy Act does not allow consumers to opt-out of automated "profiling."
  • The "personal information" protected by the bill includes information that is linked or reasonably linkable to an identified or identifiable individual. "Personal information" does not include deidentified, aggregated or publicly available information.
  • The Act would exclude employee data and business-to-business contact information from its scope, following similar exclusions in other states.
  • The Act creates a category of "sensitive" information, which includes information about racial or ethnic origin, religious beliefs, sexual orientation, citizenship or immigration status, health, biometric or genetic data, and geolocation data. However, instead of following the Virginia/Colorado model and requiring opt-in consent for the collection and processing of sensitive information, the Act would require businesses to provide notice and an opportunity to opt out of the use of "sensitive" data.
  • The Utah Consumer Privacy Act is exclusively enforced through actions by the Utah Attorney General. The law does not provide for a private right of action.
  • The Act grants the Utah Department of Commerce Division of Consumer Protection the power to investigate consumer complaints regarding the processing of their personal information by a business. If the director of the Division of Consumer Protection has reasonable cause to believe that substantial evidence exists that the business is in violation of the law, the director will then refer the matter to the Attorney General.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From McDermott Will & Emery

Welcome Chris Salmen

By Christopher Salmen McDermott Will & Emery May 24 , 2023

Chris Salmen joined McDermott+Consulting earlier this month as a senior director, bringing his unique blend of medical device, diagnostic and digital health experience to advise clients on their go-to-market strategy.

Debt Limit Deadlock Continues

By Debra Curtis McDermott Will & Emery May 22 , 2023

Debbie Curtis and Rodney Whitlock discuss what the debt limit deadlock means for healthcare stakeholders as the June 1 deadline draws closer.

McDermottPlus Check-Up: May 19, 2023

By Debra Curtis McDermott Will & Emery May 19 , 2023

The House and Senate were both in session this week, with significant healthcare activity at the committee level.

More From Cybersecurity

Finding the Delta: Understanding the Differences in How State Privacy Laws Define Corporate Affiliates

By David A. Zetoony Greenberg Traurig May 15 , 2023

All modern privacy statutes regulate when personal information can be shared with third parties, whether those third parties are service providers, vendors, contractors, or business partners.

CISA Self-Attestation Form Brings Clarity to Pending Secure Software Requirements for Government Contractors

By Robert Duffy McDermott Will & Emery May 09 , 2023

Producers of software sold to the US government are facing an impending requirement to attest that their software is securely developed.

Yuga Labs Scores Another Victory With Summary Judgment Win

By Mioko C. Tajika Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti May 09 , 2023

In our prior post, we wrote about the closely-watched Yuga Labs v. Ryder Ripps case and how the defendants’ motion to dismiss and anti-SLAPP motion were denied.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...