SHARE

March 17, 2022

Miramax Sues Quentin Taratino Over "Pulp Fiction" NFT Auction

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

Key Takeaways

  • Hollywood film studio Miramax recently filed a lawsuit against director Quentin Tarantino and others over his plans to auction off non-fungible tokens (NFTs) based on the 1994 film, Pulp Fiction.

Hollywood film studio Miramax recently filed a lawsuit against director Quentin Tarantino and others over his plans to auction off non-fungible tokens (NFTs) based on the 1994 film, Pulp Fiction.

This dispute began on November 2, when Tarantino announced at the NFT.NYC crypto-art conference that he would be auctioning off seven uncut Pulp Fiction scenes as Secret NFTs. Secret NFTs are built on the Secret Network, the first Layer 1 blockchain with privacy-by-default for applications. Typically, images that are featured in a collector's NFT wallet are visible to the public, with no option given to the creator or owner to have the images remain private. Secret NFTs are different, in that they enable NFTs to contain both public and private metadata and they allow the owner to choose between publicly displaying ownership or keeping it a secret. Tarantino's NFTs that are up for auction contain one or more previously unknown secrets of a specific iconic scene from Pulp Fiction that are only viewable by the owner of the NFT, including the uncut first handwritten scripts and exclusive custom commentary from Tarantino. The NFT's public metadata—the "front cover" of this exclusive content—is also a one-of-a-kind, unique, never-before-seen, public-facing work of art.

The complaint states claims for breach of contract, copyright infringement, trademark infringement and unfair competition. The suit appears to turn on the issue of whether selling NFTs based on, among others, excerpts of a handwritten screenplay qualifies as a "screenplay publication" or "print publication." According to the complaint, Tarantino asserted in response to Miramax's cease and desist letter that he has retained a limited set of "Reserved Rights" with respect to the film, and he is acting within his "Reserved Rights," specifically the right to "screenplay publication" (which is a subset of his Reserved Rights to "print publication") through the NFT auction. Miramax contends that Tarantino's proposed sale of NFTs are a one-time transaction, which does not constitute publication, and does not fall within the meaning of "screenplay publication" or "print publication." Miramax therefore claims that it owns the exclusive right to sell NFTs of any version of the screenplay for Pulp Fiction.

This dispute is not the first lawsuit over NFTs and it will not be the last. No matter the outcome, contracts governing intellectual property rights will definitely take NFTs into consideration going forward.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti

Legalized & Leasing - The Dilemma Facing NYC Landlords And Unlicensed Marijuana Dispensaries

By Michael A. Mulia Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti January 27 , 2023

The cannabis cash grab is fully underway in New York City and many commercial landlords (whether willingly or unwillingly) find themselves as key participants in the industry.

One Man's Trash Is Another Man's ... House?!

By Christine S. Varghese Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti January 26 , 2023

Would you live in a house made of recycled plastic water bottles?

Judge Tosses First Amendment Defense In Yuga Labs V. Ryder Ripps

By Mioko C. Tajika Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti January 24 , 2023

On December 16, 2022, a federal district judge in California denied artist Ryder Ripps’s and his partner’s anti-SLAPP motion and motion to dismiss in a closely monitored action filed against them by Yuga Labs, Inc. (“Yuga”), the creator behind the monumentally successful Bored Ape Yacht Club (“BAYC”) NFTs.

More From Contracts

IRS Releases Memorandum on Deducting Cryptocurrency Losses

By Andrew M. Granek McDermott Will & Emery January 26 , 2023

On January 13, 2023, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released a Chief Counsel Advice Memorandum (CCA 202302011) concluding that taxpayers cannot claim a deduction for cryptocurrency losses that have, absent a sale or other taxable disposition, substantially declined in value if such cryptocurrency continues to trade on at least one cryptocurrency exchange and has a value that is greater than zero.

Judge Tosses First Amendment Defense In Yuga Labs V. Ryder Ripps

By Mioko C. Tajika Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti January 24 , 2023

On December 16, 2022, a federal district judge in California denied artist Ryder Ripps’s and his partner’s anti-SLAPP motion and motion to dismiss in a closely monitored action filed against them by Yuga Labs, Inc. (“Yuga”), the creator behind the monumentally successful Bored Ape Yacht Club (“BAYC”) NFTs.

IRS Releases Memorandum on Deducting Cryptocurrency Donations

By John T. Lutz McDermott Will & Emery January 18 , 2023

On January 13, 2023, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released a memorandum (CCA 202302012) concluding that a qualified appraisal is required when a taxpayer claims a charitable contribution deduction exceeding $5,000 for donated cryptocurrency.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...