December 31, 2021

FTC bans phantom debt collectors from industry

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all OnPractice content.
Register Now

On December 13, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that, under the terms of a settlement, a group of phantom debt collectors were permanently banned from the debt collection industry. The term "phantom debt" is generally used to refer to debt that doesn't exist or has already been paid.

In its related complaint, the FTC alleged that the defendants collected on debt that was not owed or that the defendants had no right to collect.  The complaint further alleged (1) the defendants used robocalls to leave deceptive messages claiming consumers faced imminent legal action, and (2) when consumers returned these robocalls, the defendants falsely claimed to be from a mediation or law firm, again threatened legal action, and then used the consumers' personal information to convince them that the threats were real.

Under the terms of the settlement, the defendants were permanently banned from engaging in debt collection of any kind. They were also banned from buying or selling debt, and from making any misrepresentations to consumers about any goods or services.  The settlement also included a monetary judgment of $12,098,760.

The FTC's complaint was taken as part of its ongoing "Operation Corrupt Collector" initiative, a nationwide law enforcement and outreach program launched in conjunction with over 50 federal and state law enforcement partners aimed at protecting consumers from phantom debt collection and abusive and threatening debt collection practices. To date, Operation Corrupt Collector encompasses more than 50 enforcement actions against debt collectors engaged in these illegal practices brought by the FTC and its federal and state partners.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Ballard Spahr

New York Restricts Automated Decision Making in Employment

By Timothy Dickens Ballard Spahr August 29 , 2022

Businesses operating in New York City should be aware of a local law addressing the use of automated employment screening and decision-making tools coming into effect on January 1, 2023.

Status Update: Federal Contractor Vaccine Mandate Injunction Narrowed

By Lila A. Sevener Ballard Spahr August 29 , 2022

On August 26, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit narrowed the nationwide injunction of Executive Order 14042, which requires federal contractors and employees who work on or in connection with a covered federal contract, or share a workplace with another employee who works on or in connection with such contracts, to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19.

Unions Cannot Force OSHA to Issue Permanent COVID Standard

By Shannon D. Farmer Ballard Spahr August 26 , 2022

On August 26, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit turned back efforts by a group of unions seeking to force the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to quickly issue a permanent rule establishing protections for healthcare workers from COVID-19.

More From Creditors’ and Debtors’ Rights

Schedule A I-140: Fast-Track Green Card for Nurses and Physical Therapists

By Caterina Cappellari Greenberg Traurig May 26 , 2023

Most employment-based permanent residency applications require the applicant to go through the PERM labor certification process where the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) certifies that there are not sufficient U.S. workers able, available, and qualified to fill a position.

SCOTUS to Warhol Foundation: Your Use of Previously Licensed Work Isn't Fair

By Steven J. Wadyka Jr. Greenberg Traurig May 26 , 2023

On May 18, 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith, a case that presented the Court with an opportunity to bring clarity to the often highly subjective standards lower courts apply when deciding the issue of fair use of visual works of art under copyright law.

Supreme Court Issues Decision Sharply Limiting Clean Water Act Jurisdiction over Wetlands

By Bernadette M. Rappold Greenberg Traurig May 26 , 2023

Sometimes the most monumental Supreme Court decisions spring from the most modest facts.

Featured Stories