SHARE

December 31, 2021

Hotel Group Seller's COVID-19 Response Breaches 'Ordinary Course' Covenant, Excusing Buyer's Performance

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

Delaware's Supreme Court held this month that a buyer's obligation to close a hotel group purchase was excused where the seller adopted what it described as "proportional changes in response to extraordinary circumstances-like the responses of other hotel owners in response to the pandemic." The case is AB Stable VIII LLC v. MAPS Hotels and Resorts One LLC, No. 71, 2021 (Del. Dec. 8, 2021).

In affirming the Delaware Chancery Court's holding that the seller violated a covenant to conduct its business "only in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice," the Delaware Supreme Court held the covenant meant that the seller's "compliance is measured by its operational history, and not that of the industry in which it operates."

The parties entered into the sale agreement in early September 2019, with closing deferred to provide time to quiet title and arrange financing. In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, which hit in February 2020, the seller temporarily closed two properties and substantially reduced operations and headcount for others. On the April 17, 2020 closing date, the buyer notified the seller it was in default and refused to close. Although the sellers "actions might have been reasonable in response to a world-wide pandemic," the Court held, "they were inconsistent with past practice and far from ordinary," and required the buyer's approval "which could not be unreasonably withheld."

The case underscores the risk that "ordinary course" covenants may be triggered by unforeseeable circumstances and teaches the need for sellers and buyers to specifically consider the allocation of such risks.

Ballard Spahr Securities Enforcement and Corporate Governance Litigation attorneys can assist businesses in negotiating contracts to address risks and challenges stemming from such unexpected events, and, where necessary, in resolving disputes under such contracts through litigation and/or ADR.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Ballard Spahr

New York Restricts Automated Decision Making in Employment

By Timothy Dickens Ballard Spahr August 29 , 2022

Businesses operating in New York City should be aware of a local law addressing the use of automated employment screening and decision-making tools coming into effect on January 1, 2023.

Status Update: Federal Contractor Vaccine Mandate Injunction Narrowed

By Lila A. Sevener Ballard Spahr August 29 , 2022

On August 26, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit narrowed the nationwide injunction of Executive Order 14042, which requires federal contractors and employees who work on or in connection with a covered federal contract, or share a workplace with another employee who works on or in connection with such contracts, to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19.

Unions Cannot Force OSHA to Issue Permanent COVID Standard

By Shannon D. Farmer Ballard Spahr August 26 , 2022

On August 26, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit turned back efforts by a group of unions seeking to force the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to quickly issue a permanent rule establishing protections for healthcare workers from COVID-19.

More From Corporate Governance

SEC Adopts Amendments to Share Repurchase Disclosure Rules

By Tricia Branker Greenberg Traurig May 24 , 2023

On May 3, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments to issuer share repurchase disclosure rules, aimed at providing investors with enhanced information to enable them to better “assess the efficiency, purposes, and impacts of share repurchases.”

McDermottPlus Check-Up: May 19, 2023

By Debra Curtis McDermott Will & Emery May 19 , 2023

The House and Senate were both in session this week, with significant healthcare activity at the committee level.

Are Syndicated Term Loans Securities Under Reves v. Ernst & Young? 2nd Circuit Solicits SEC Views

By Daria K. Boxer Greenberg Traurig May 18 , 2023

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has asked the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to share its views on the issue of whether syndicated term loans are securities for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), under the four-prong “family resemblance” test enumerated in Reves v. Ernst & Young, 494 U.S. 56 (1990).

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...