SHARE

December 21, 2021

COVID-19 Vaccination Incentives: Restrictions that Come with Rewards

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

Summary

A set of Frequently Asked Questions addresses several issues of vital interest to employers in assessing the connection between COVID-19 vaccinations and their health plans.

The Upshot

  • The FAQs confirm that the preventive care rules under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) require health plans to cover the full cost of vaccinations that have received an emergency use authorization from the CDC or have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
  • Drawing on HIPAA's nondiscrimination rules, the FAQs provide that, if an incentive program requires unvaccinated employees to contribute more toward the cost of health coverage than vaccinated employees, the program must meet the detailed requirements applicable to health-contingent wellness programs. They also provide that health plans may not exclude individuals from coverage based on their vaccination status.
  • The FAQs describe the effect that health plan contribution incentives may have on the Affordable Care Act employer mandate, which establishes standards for the affordability of coverage. For purposes of these affordability standards, the cost of coverage to an employee will not take into account any wellness incentive that reduces premiums, but will take into account any surcharge that might apply.

The Bottom Line

Employers contemplating health plan incentives for those who remain unvaccinated will need to consider these restrictions. 


 

Many employers have considered ways of encouraging employees to receive COVID-19 vaccinations, including incentives related to employee contributions toward the cost of health coverage.  The Departments of Labor, the Treasury, and Health and Human Services have jointly issued a set of Frequently Asked Questions that addresses several issues of vital interest to employers in assessing the connection between COVID-19 vaccinations and their health plans.

First, the FAQs confirm that the preventive care rules under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) require health plans to cover the full cost of vaccinations that have received an emergency use authorization from the Centers for Disease Control or approval of a biologics license application from the Food and Drug Administration. 

Second, the FAQs address HIPAA's nondiscrimination rules, stating clearly that health plans may not exclude individuals based on their vaccination status. More significantly, the FAQs address HIPAA's nondiscrimination rules governing wellness programs. They assert that incentives offered with regard to employee health plan contributions must satisfy the detailed requirements applicable to health-contingent wellness programs, treating the vaccination as an activity related to an individual's health condition. This characterization of the program means that the incentive program must:

  • Be available to all similarly situated individuals and that individuals must have the right to qualify for the incentive at least once per year.
  • Be reasonably designed to promote health or prevent disease.
  • Make available a reasonable alternative for those who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons (for example, a plan may waive the vaccination requirement for those who are unable to receive the vaccine for medical reasons or require them to attest that they follow other COVID protocols, like mask-wearing).
  • Provide notice of the availability of a reasonable alternative.
  • Limit the value of the incentive, generally to no more than 30% of the total cost of employee-only coverage.

Finally, the FAQs describe the effect that health plan contribution incentives may have on the Affordable Care Act employer mandate, which establishes standards for the affordability of coverage. For purposes of these affordability standards, the cost of coverage to an employee will not take into account any wellness incentive that reduces premiums, but will take into account any surcharge that might apply. The only exception to this rule is for incentives related to tobacco use, which will not apply to a COVID-19 vaccination incentive.

Employers contemplating health plan incentives for those who remain unvaccinated will need to consider these restrictions. They may find that the employer mandate rules impose a more significant limit on the value of an incentive than the HIPAA nondiscrimination requirements. 

As the FAQs observe, the new guidance does not speak to other rules that might apply.  For example, the FAQs do not address how incentive programs will be treated under the Americans with Disabilities Act. By the same token, they do not apply (and their restrictions will not extend) to employment-based incentives that employers may offer outside of their health plans.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Ballard Spahr

New York Restricts Automated Decision Making in Employment

By Timothy Dickens Ballard Spahr August 29 , 2022

Businesses operating in New York City should be aware of a local law addressing the use of automated employment screening and decision-making tools coming into effect on January 1, 2023.

Status Update: Federal Contractor Vaccine Mandate Injunction Narrowed

By Lila A. Sevener Ballard Spahr August 29 , 2022

On August 26, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit narrowed the nationwide injunction of Executive Order 14042, which requires federal contractors and employees who work on or in connection with a covered federal contract, or share a workplace with another employee who works on or in connection with such contracts, to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19.

Unions Cannot Force OSHA to Issue Permanent COVID Standard

By Shannon D. Farmer Ballard Spahr August 26 , 2022

On August 26, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit turned back efforts by a group of unions seeking to force the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to quickly issue a permanent rule establishing protections for healthcare workers from COVID-19.

More From COVID-19

GT's The Performance Review Episode 20: All Secrets Revealed: Employee Investigations

By Philip I. Person Greenberg Traurig May 24 , 2023

In this episode, Sue Ann Van Dermyden, co-founder and senior partner at one of the nation’s top investigations firms, joins Philip Person and Ryan Bykerk to discuss the ins and outs of employee investigations.

EEOC Classwide Subpoena Based on Individual Allegations Too Broad, Federal Appeals Court Rules

By Stephanie L. Adler-Paindiris Jackson Lewis P.C. May 17 , 2023

Denying the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) request to enforce a subpoena that would have expanded the agency’s investigation on a classwide basis, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has held the EEOC did not have the authority to expand the investigation beyond the individual allegations in the charge.

The Whistleblower Protection Act is coming - what you can expect and what you need to do

By Dr. Kara Preedy Greenberg Traurig May 16 , 2023

On May 11, 2023, the Whistleblower Protection Act (“Hinweisgeberschutzgesetz”) was passed in the German Bundestag and is now being presented to the Federal President for signature after being approved by the German Bundesrat.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...