SHARE

December 08, 2021

Holiday Cyber Best Practices: CISA and FBI Guidance

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

With the holiday season ahead, past trends indicate that threat actors will take advantage of businesses and organizations at reduced staffing levels and individuals working remotely. This alert highlights actions that can be taken proactively to defend against possible ransomware, business email compromise, or other forms of cyber threats.

The Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency and the FBI strongly urge all entities-especially critical infrastructure partners-to examine their current cybersecurity posture and implement best practices and mitigations to manage the risk posed by cyber threats. Specifically, CISA and the FBI urge users and organizations to take the following actions to protect themselves from becoming the next victim:

  • Identify business operations and technical security personnel for weekends and holidays that would be available to surge in the event of an incident or ransomware attack.
  • Implement multi-factor authentication for remote access and administrative accounts.
  • Mandate strong passwords or passphrases and ensure they are not reused across multiple accounts.
  • If you use remote desktop protocol (RDP) or any other potentially risky service, ensure it is secure and monitored.
  • Remind employees not to click on suspicious links and conduct exercises to raise awareness.

In addition to CISA and the FBI's recommended actions, preparation including reviewing, practicing, and updating incident response plans, remote work plans, and backup contact trees can help to reduce the risk of business interruption.

For more information, contact Lauren Saleh [email protected] or Jeffrey Wells [email protected].

The views and opinions expressed in the article represent the view of the author and not necessarily the official view of Clark Hill PLC. Nothing in this article constitutes professional legal advice nor is intended to be a substitute for professional legal advice. 

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Clark Hill, PLC

What the California Environmental Quality Act Means for Cannabis Operators in the Golden State

By Steven L. Hoch Clark Hill, PLC March 22 , 2022

Cannabis is big business in California.

EPA Proposes Updates to the Hazardous Air Pollutant Copper Smelting Rules

By Danielle M. Hazeltine Clark Hill, PLC March 22 , 2022

On Jan. 11, EPA proposed more stringent National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) that apply to both major and area source primary copper smelters.

Investing in State Law Compliant Cannabis Businesses: Part 2 - Diving Deeper

By Sander C. Zagzebski Clark Hill, PLC March 21 , 2022

In Part 1 of this two-part series, we addressed the high-level concerns that a new investor should consider in making an investment in a state legal cannabis company. In this follow up, we address some of the more nuanced issues that investors should consider before deciding to invest in a specific cannabis company.

More From Cybersecurity

SCOTUS to Warhol Foundation: Your Use of Previously Licensed Work Isn't Fair

By Steven J. Wadyka Jr. Greenberg Traurig May 26 , 2023

On May 18, 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith, a case that presented the Court with an opportunity to bring clarity to the often highly subjective standards lower courts apply when deciding the issue of fair use of visual works of art under copyright law.

On the Road Again: Alternative Designs May Impact Trade Dress Functionality Analysis

By Kavya Rallabhandi McDermott Will & Emery May 25 , 2023

The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed and remanded a summary judgment ruling, finding that there were genuine disputes of material fact regarding whether the plaintiff’s alleged trade dress was functional and therefore excluded from trade dress protection.

Elevate the $: Geographic Isolation Helps Defeat Trademark Infringement Claim

By Kat Lynch McDermott Will & Emery May 25 , 2023

In a case between similarly named banks, the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit confirmed expert disclosure requirements, conducted a de novo likelihood of confusion analysis and ultimately upheld a finding of no trademark infringement.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...