October 29, 2021

New York Adopts Changes to Modernize Regulation D Filings

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all OnPractice content.
Register Now

On April 6, 2020, New York Attorney General Letitia James announced proposed revisions to existing rules to modernize and streamline the process for making required filings in New York State related to private placements of securities conducted pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"). The proposed revisions, which move New York toward consistency with other states on notice filings arising from Rule 506 offerings, were adopted in December 2020.


Article 23-A of the New York General Business Law (commonly referred to as the "Martin Act"), New York's securities law, imposes registration and disclosure requirements on participants in the securities industry, including issuers of securities. However, many practitioners have long argued that the Martin Act goes beyond the scope of, and is inconsistent with, state regulation permitted by the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996 ("NSMIA") with respect to its requirements for offerings of securities conducted under Rule 506. NSMIA preempts the ability of states to require registration or qualification of federal "covered securities," which include those securities issued pursuant to Rule 506. Under NSMIA, states are limited to requiring notice filings and filing fees related to the issuance of covered securities.

The Martin Act, however, requires registration, which process includes the manual filing of a signed Form 99 together with a signed and notarized Form U-2 (Uniform Consent to Service of Process) and a State Notice and Further State Notice. As such, practitioners have argued that NSMIA preempts the more onerous requirements under the Martin Act. Issuers who otherwise provide notice and pay a fee to the various other states involved in a Rule 506 offering, where required under the securities laws of such other states, have in many cases been advised by legal counsel that no such filing, nor the payment of any such fee, need be made in New York with respect to such offering as a result of the NSMIA preemption. This interpretation was bolstered by a New York State Bar Association position paper to this effect that was issued in 2002 (the "Position Paper"), which argued that the Martin Act requirements constituted an impermissible regulatory scheme running parallel to the Securities Act.

Summary of Amendments

The proposed amendments to the Martin Act that were adopted by the NY Attorney General revise existing regulations to require, beginning on December 2, 2020, notice filings for "covered securities" that are offered within or from New York under Rule 506. Specifically, within 15 days of the first sale of securities in a Rule 506 offering within or from New York, issuers must file with the Investor Protection Bureau of the Department of Law (the "IPB") a copy of the Notice of Exempt Offering of Securities on Form D that the issuer filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") with respect to such offering. Issuers must also pay a filing fee of either (i) $300 for offerings in an amount less than $500,000 or (ii) $1,200 for offerings in an amount equal to or greater than $500,000. The filings and payments are to be effectuated through the North American Association of Securities Administrators' electronic filing depository system ("EFD"), through which such filings are effectuated for most states.

Issuers will be required to file an amended Form D with New York when an amendment is filed with the SEC. Annual updates to Form D that do not include any amended information will not be subject to any filing fee, while annual updates that include updated information, as well as amendments other than annual amendments, will be subject to a $30 filing fee. Further, any offering that continues for more than four years will incur a renewal fee.

The IPB will not accept any new Form 99 or Form 99 renewal submissions after February 1, 2021.


As a result of the amendments to the Martin Act described above, issuers who engage in private placements of securities under Rule 506 of the Securities Act in New York must be prepared to make the requisite notice filings in and pay the corresponding fees to, New York. This will be the case regardless of the position that such issuers took regarding securities filings in New York arising from private placements that they conducted in the past.

Further, given that the New York Attorney General, in its assessment of the comments that it received in response to the proposed changes to the Martin Act, rejected the ABA's interpretation articulated in the Position Paper, those issuers who previously elected not to file a Form 99 in New York with respect to private placements under Rule 506 may wish to file a Form D notice through EFD to ensure compliance with New York law.

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Pryor Cashman

IP Rights in the Metaverse: An Evolving (Virtual) World

By Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme Pryor Cashman August 02 , 2022

Today, all eyes are on the metaverse as the legal questions it poses will fundamentally change the contours of intellectual property law.

The CFPB's Fintech Power Grab

By Jeffrey Alberts Pryor Cashman June 29 , 2022

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced this April that it intends to begin using a “dormant” authority to conduct regulatory examinations of nonbank financial companies when they pose risks to consumers.

Is the SEC's Regulation of Crypto Lenders Self-Defeating?

By Jeffrey Alberts Pryor Cashman March 30 , 2022

U.S. holders of cryptocurrency have been eager to participate in the crypto lending market, but recent actions by the SEC are causing unexpected, and likely unintended, changes in how these loans are made.

More From Corporate Governance

SEC Adopts Amendments to Share Repurchase Disclosure Rules

By Tricia Branker Greenberg Traurig May 24 , 2023

On May 3, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments to issuer share repurchase disclosure rules, aimed at providing investors with enhanced information to enable them to better “assess the efficiency, purposes, and impacts of share repurchases.”

Are Syndicated Term Loans Securities Under Reves v. Ernst & Young? 2nd Circuit Solicits SEC Views

By Daria K. Boxer Greenberg Traurig May 18 , 2023

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has asked the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to share its views on the issue of whether syndicated term loans are securities for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), under the four-prong “family resemblance” test enumerated in Reves v. Ernst & Young, 494 U.S. 56 (1990).

EU Commission Adopts New Merger Simplification Package

By Jacques Buhart McDermott Will & Emery May 12 , 2023

On April 20, 2023, the EU Commission (Commission) adopted and published a package to simplify the procedures for reviewing concentrations under Regulation (EC) 139/2004 of January 20, 2004 (European Union Merger Regulation – EUMR). This package includes a set of three materials comprising (i) a revised Merger Implementing Regulation (Implementing Regulation), (ii) a Notice on Simplified Procedure (Notice), and (iii) a Communication on the Transmission of Documents to the Commission (Communication).

Featured Stories