SHARE

October 14, 2021

Federal Regulation Update: CMS Seeks to Yank Most Favored Nation Model

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

For more information about this blog post, please contact Khaled J. KleleRyan M. MageeLabinot Alexander Berlajolli, or Brianna J. Santolli

86 FR 43618: This proposed rule rescinds the Most Favored Nation ("MFN") Model - a drug pricing model that matches payments for Medicare Part B drugs and biologicals to the lowest price paid by other comparable countries. The MFN was intended as an innovative way to lower prescription drug costs, reduce Medicare reimbursement rates to healthcare facilities, and open negotiations to discounts with drug manufacturers.

Instead, however, as we covered in previous blog posts, several federal district courts intervened to temporarily prevent the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") from implementing the MFN, originally scheduled to begin January 1, 2021. On December 23, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland issued a nationwide temporary restraining order, enjoining CMS's implementation of the rule. In a related case, just days later on December 28, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California followed suit. Two more days later, on December 30, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York also issued its own injunction, enjoining implementation of the rule specifically as it pertains to EYLEA®.  The underlying lawsuits allege, among other things, that CMS violated the dictates of the APA rulemaking process, the MFN exceeds statutory authority, and the MFN raises issues of constitutionality.

CMS is supposedly exploring new opportunities to address the high cost of Medicare Part B drugs and Medicare reimbursement spending. Comments to this proposed rule are due by October 12, 2021.

86 FR 35615: This final rule finalizes the methodology and data sources necessary to determine federal payment amounts to be made for program year 2022 to states that elect to establish a Basic Health Program ("BHP") under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. A BHP is another option for states to provide affordable health benefits to lower income individuals who satisfy certain income criteria. In states that elect to operate a BHP, the BHP will make affordable health benefits coverage available for individuals under age 65 with household incomes between 133 percent and 200 percent of the federal poverty level ("FPL") who are not otherwise eligible for Medicaid, the Children's Health Insurance Program ("CHIP"), or affordable employer-sponsored coverage, or for individuals whose income is below these levels but are lawfully present non-citizens ineligible for Medicaid. 

86 FR 41803: This proposed rule would reinterpret the scope of the general requirement that State payments for Medicaid services under a State plan must be made directly to the individual practitioner providing services, in the case of a class of practitioners for which the Medicaid program is the primary source of revenue. Specifically, this proposal, if finalized, would explicitly authorize states to make payments to third parties to benefit individual practitioners by ensuring health and welfare benefits, training, and other benefits customary for employees, if the practitioner consents to such payments to third parties on the practitioner's behalf. Comments are due by September 28, 2021.  

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP

SEC May Require Advisers and Funds to Draft Cybersecurity Policies and Disclose Incidents

By Michael P. O'Mullan Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP February 11 , 2022

Following the rise of cybercrime and on the coattails of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) promulgating final rules concerning cybersecurity requirements for the financial services sector, we knew that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was not far behind.

New York Insurance Disclosure Act May Cause Significant Changes In New York State Court Lawsuits

By Brian E. O’Donnell Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP February 10 , 2022

On December 31, 2021, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed into law the Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act (the “Act”)

FINRA to Prioritize Cryptocurrency, Options Account Paperwork, and Expungement Reform in 2022

By Michael P. O'Mullan Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP January 24 , 2022

During a January 19, 2021, webinar with the SIFMA Compliance & Legal Society, FINRA president and CEO Robert Cook discussed with participants FINRA’s priorities for 2022.

More From Health Care Law

CY 2023 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule

By McDermott Will & Emery attorneys McDermott Will & Emery September 28 , 2022

On July 7, 2022, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the CY 2023 Revisions to Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Revisions to Medicare Part B Proposed Rule, which was published in the Federal Register on July 29, 2022.

Want to Provide Abortion Travel Benefits at Your Company? Here's How to Protect Employees

By Sarah G. Raaii McDermott Will & Emery September 01 , 2022

Companies that have come forward to offer travel benefits to employees going out of state to obtain an abortion face a vexing question: How can they avoid creating a paper trail that law enforcement could access to confirm that an individual has received an abortion?

Status Update: Federal Contractor Vaccine Mandate Injunction Narrowed

By Lila A. Sevener Ballard Spahr August 29 , 2022

On August 26, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit narrowed the nationwide injunction of Executive Order 14042, which requires federal contractors and employees who work on or in connection with a covered federal contract, or share a workplace with another employee who works on or in connection with such contracts, to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...