SHARE

October 14, 2021

Fifth Circuit Holds Individual Guarantor Waived His Right to Challenge Guaranty in Forbearance Agreements

You've Reached Your
Free Article Limit This Month
Register for free to get unlimited access to all Law.com OnPractice content.
Register Now

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently rejected an individual guarantor's ("Lockwood") fraudulent inducement and duress claims and held that the guaranty he entered was enforceable and that he waived any defenses to the same in subsequent forbearance agreements. See Lockwood Int'l, Inc. v. Wells Fargo, Nat'l Ass'n,, 2021 WL 3624748 (5th Cir. Aug. 16, 2021).  In 2015, some of Lockwood's companies had entered into revolving credit notes totaling $90 million.  After the borrowers breached some of their obligations in 2016, the lenders restructured the deals and Lockwood provided a personal guaranty.  After further defaults, Lockwood and the borrowers entered into a forbearance agreement where he acknowledged his obligations on the loans and waived all defenses.  After even more defaults, they entered a second forbearance, again acknowledging the obligations and waiving defenses.  Finally, after more defaults, the lenders accelerated and this lawsuit followed.  The lenders moved for summary judgment on the guaranty, and Lockwood opposed, arguing defenses of fraudulent inducement, duress, unclean hands, and equitable estoppel.  The District Court granted the lenders' motion, ordering Lockwood to pay $58,710,456.26, plus interest, attorneys' fees, and costs.

On appeal, the Court affirmed.  It first held that "[t]o avoid enforcement of the guaranty, Lockwood needs a hat trick: He must show that the guaranty, the first forbearance agreement, and the second forbearance agreement are all voidable."  The Court then found that "[e]ven if the guaranty itself is voidable—something we doubt but need not resolve—the first forbearance agreement ratified its terms."  Despite Lockwood's claims, the Court found that the lenders did not fraudulently induce Lockwood into executing the forbearance, because he was aware of all material terms ahead of executing it.  Additionally, the Court rejected Lockwood's claims of duress:  "No doubt Lockwood feared the looming prospect of the banks' demanding the tens of millions of dollars that he and his companies owed. The banks used that leverage to seek something they wanted . . . But using leverage is what negotiation is all about. And difficult economic circumstances do not alone give rise to duress.  If they did, then many loans would be voidable."  Accordingly, the Court found the guaranty was enforceable against Lockwood. 

For a copy of the decision, please contact Michael O'Donnell at [email protected], Michael Crowley at [email protected], Desiree McDonald at [email protected], or Kevin Hakansson at [email protected].

ALM expressly disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the OnPractice Content, including any implied warranty that the OnPractice Content is accurate, has been corrected or is otherwise free from errors.

More From Riker Danzig LLP

SEC May Require Advisers and Funds to Draft Cybersecurity Policies and Disclose Incidents

By Michael P. O'Mullan Riker Danzig LLP February 11 , 2022

Following the rise of cybercrime and on the coattails of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) promulgating final rules concerning cybersecurity requirements for the financial services sector, we knew that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was not far behind.

New York Insurance Disclosure Act May Cause Significant Changes In New York State Court Lawsuits

By Brian E. O’Donnell Riker Danzig LLP February 10 , 2022

On December 31, 2021, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed into law the Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act (the “Act”)

FINRA to Prioritize Cryptocurrency, Options Account Paperwork, and Expungement Reform in 2022

By Michael P. O'Mullan Riker Danzig LLP January 24 , 2022

During a January 19, 2021, webinar with the SIFMA Compliance & Legal Society, FINRA president and CEO Robert Cook discussed with participants FINRA’s priorities for 2022.

More From Financial Services and Banking

U.S. Supreme Court Dismisses as 'Improvidently Granted' Case on Scope of Attorney-Client Privilege

By Stephanie L. Adler-Paindiris Jackson Lewis P.C. January 30 , 2023

In a per curiam opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court has dismissed the writ of certiorari granted in In re: Grand Jury, No. 21-1397, writing only that it was “improvidently granted.”

This Week in 340B: January 17 - 23, 2023

By Emily Jane Cook McDermott Will & Emery January 26 , 2023

This weekly series provides brief summaries to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country.

Your Gang Did What!? No Matter—No Forfeiture of IP

By Kat Lynch McDermott Will & Emery January 26 , 2023

In a unique case blending intellectual property and criminal law, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agreed that a district court properly exercised jurisdiction over a motorcycle club and upheld the lower court’s finding that the club did not have to forfeit its collective membership marks.

Featured Stories
Closeclose
Search
Menu

Working...